proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Natixis › 2024-2025

Natixis proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Natixis reported 66,649 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 18,402 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 91.1% of the time. On the 1,143 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 12.3% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

91.1% FOR of 18,402 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 16,772 AGAINST 1,403 Abstained or withheld 227

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

12.3% FOR of 1,143 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,143.

FOR 141 AGAINST 1,002 Abstained 3

See the 141 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Natixis, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (2 inferred) 11,838 11,603 94.0% 6.0% 213
Director Elections Shareholders (7 inferred) 7 7 71.4% 28.6% 0
Say-on-Pay Board (5 inferred) 3,820 3,577 86.7% 13.3% 5
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (2 inferred) 4 4 50.0% 50.0% 0
Audit-related Board 1,448 1,440 96.8% 3.2% 8
Audit-related Shareholders (1 inferred) 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board 1,140 1,131 87.0% 13.0% 5
Corporate Governance Shareholders (2 inferred) 279 277 54.2% 45.8% 0
Compensation Board 790 772 82.6% 17.4% 0
Compensation Shareholders (1 inferred) 95 95 37.9% 62.1% 0
Capital Structure Board 769 766 93.6% 6.4% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 37 37 29.7% 70.3% 0
Other Social Issues Board 45 45 82.2% 17.8% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 729 725 15.0% 85.0% 3
Environment or Climate Board 3 3 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 555 552 1.1% 98.9% 3
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 393 390 4.9% 95.1% 3
Other Board 322 305 92.5% 7.5% 16
Other Shareholders 3 3 0.0% 100.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 168 167 9.0% 91.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 47 47 91.5% 8.5% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (3 inferred) 54 54 48.1% 51.9% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 48 47 97.9% 2.1% 1

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (23 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Natixis broke with the board (1,025 distinct proposals) →

What Natixis said it would do

The page above is what Natixis did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Natixis IM, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Natixis filed 66,649 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 21,571 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 2,415 issuer names and 27 funds. They cover 10,569 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
289 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type233 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate1 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote55 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Natixis proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.