proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Natixis › 2023-2024

Natixis proxy voting record, 2023-2024

Natixis reported 70,053 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 18,810 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 91.7% of the time. On the 1,460 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 18.9% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

91.7% FOR of 18,810 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 17,245 AGAINST 1,184 Abstained or withheld 381

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

18.9% FOR of 1,460 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,312.

FOR 276 AGAINST 1,184 Abstained 2

See the 276 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Natixis, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (3 inferred) 12,046 11,593 95.9% 4.1% 373
Director Elections Shareholders (1 inferred) 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 4,333 3,803 86.0% 14.0% 4
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (4 inferred) 4 2 0.0% 100.0% 0
Audit-related Board 1,497 1,492 97.5% 2.5% 3
Audit-related Shareholders (1 inferred) 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board 1,082 1,075 81.0% 19.0% 4
Corporate Governance Shareholders 399 391 48.3% 51.7% 0
Other Social Issues Board 45 45 77.8% 22.2% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 996 986 12.5% 87.5% 2
Compensation Board 688 673 84.7% 15.3% 1
Compensation Shareholders (2 inferred) 172 169 25.4% 74.6% 1
Capital Structure Board 841 838 94.7% 5.3% 0
Environment or Climate Board 6 6 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 376 373 13.1% 86.9% 0
Other Board 359 357 86.3% 13.7% 1
Other Shareholders 20 4 0.0% 100.0% 16
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 315 310 29.7% 70.3% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 26 25 96.0% 4.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 137 137 66.4% 33.6% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 116 112 50.0% 50.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 64 64 96.9% 3.1% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (11 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Natixis broke with the board (1,154 distinct proposals) →

What Natixis said it would do

The page above is what Natixis did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Natixis IM, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Natixis filed 70,053 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 22,911 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 2,446 issuer names and 27 funds. They cover 11,179 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
661 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted2 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type517 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote142 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Natixis proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.