proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Lincoln Financial › 2023-2024

Lincoln Financial proxy voting record, 2023-2024

Lincoln Financial reported 241,278 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 176,961 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 90.0% of the time. On the 3,262 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 17.9% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

90.0% FOR of 176,961 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 159,344 AGAINST 12,000 Abstained or withheld 5,617

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

17.9% FOR of 3,262 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 2,832.

FOR 584 AGAINST 2,678 Abstained 7

See the 584 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Lincoln Financial, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (1,140 inferred) 119,325 108,890 94.7% 5.3% 5,556
Director Elections Shareholders (4 inferred) 178 28 71.4% 28.6% 39
Corporate Governance Board (22 inferred) 29,076 27,303 87.0% 13.0% 100
Corporate Governance Shareholders (14 inferred) 2,113 2,030 50.0% 50.0% 6
Compensation Board (286 inferred) 18,810 18,441 82.9% 17.1% 51
Compensation Shareholders (3 inferred) 560 537 23.1% 76.9% 0
Capital Structure Board 16,802 16,488 89.3% 10.7% 2
Capital Structure Shareholders 196 194 85.1% 14.9% 0
Audit-related Board (22 inferred) 16,476 16,264 99.3% 0.7% 8
Audit-related Shareholders (7 inferred) 345 341 91.8% 8.2% 4
Say-on-Pay Board (197 inferred) 13,151 11,289 87.0% 13.0% 7
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (14 inferred) 14 7 71.4% 28.6% 0
Other Social Issues Board 751 739 96.6% 3.4% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 2,017 1,957 14.5% 85.5% 3
Other Board 2,066 1,585 70.3% 29.7% 15
Other Shareholders 293 244 29.9% 70.1% 4
Environment or Climate Board 385 375 93.3% 6.7% 2
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,604 1,580 11.6% 88.4% 2
Extraordinary Transactions Board 1,633 1,603 87.3% 12.7% 3
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 11 11 0.0% 100.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 326 320 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 845 828 12.6% 87.4% 1
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 313 307 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 788 783 19.5% 80.5% 1
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 540 515 78.4% 21.6% 7
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (1 inferred) 162 157 82.8% 17.2% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 7 0 n/a n/a 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (1,710 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Lincoln Financial broke with the board (6,250 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Lincoln Financial filed 241,278 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 219,332 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 8,225 issuer names and 91 funds. They cover 99,936 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
9,853 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted4,187 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type4,674 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote992 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Lincoln Financial proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.