proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Lincoln Financial › 2025-2026

Lincoln Financial proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Lincoln Financial reported 241,306 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 181,133 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 90.8% of the time. On the 1,727 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 6.9% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

90.8% FOR of 181,133 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 164,535 AGAINST 11,618 Abstained or withheld 4,980

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

6.9% FOR of 1,727 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,711.

FOR 120 AGAINST 1,607 Abstained 3

See the 120 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Lincoln Financial, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (2,837 inferred) 120,028 112,802 95.5% 4.5% 4,948
Director Elections Shareholders (10 inferred) 69 16 18.8% 81.2% 26
Corporate Governance Board (97 inferred) 25,845 24,066 87.5% 12.5% 257
Corporate Governance Shareholders (50 inferred) 2,400 2,367 30.5% 69.5% 12
Compensation Board (301 inferred) 17,804 17,580 82.7% 17.3% 35
Compensation Shareholders (11 inferred) 186 176 35.8% 64.2% 0
Audit-related Board (269 inferred) 17,294 17,079 97.7% 2.3% 11
Audit-related Shareholders (9 inferred) 124 118 78.0% 22.0% 5
Capital Structure Board (16 inferred) 16,018 15,826 91.2% 8.8% 5
Capital Structure Shareholders (6 inferred) 177 176 68.8% 31.2% 1
Say-on-Pay Board (463 inferred) 12,690 11,846 86.2% 13.8% 5
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (10 inferred) 24 23 95.7% 4.3% 0
Other Board (2 inferred) 2,235 1,364 52.9% 47.1% 339
Other Shareholders 192 192 29.2% 70.8% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board (6 inferred) 2,311 2,278 83.2% 16.8% 3
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 42 39 71.8% 28.2% 0
Other Social Issues Board (25 inferred) 726 717 95.0% 5.0% 2
Other Social Issues Shareholders (28 inferred) 1,125 1,111 5.9% 94.1% 1
Environment or Climate Board (18 inferred) 399 393 88.5% 11.5% 1
Environment or Climate Shareholders (17 inferred) 992 979 4.0% 96.0% 1
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board (30 inferred) 621 605 78.5% 21.5% 11
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (38 inferred) 253 253 56.5% 43.5% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board (8 inferred) 318 314 97.8% 2.2% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders (9 inferred) 367 363 3.0% 97.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board (15 inferred) 326 322 98.1% 1.9% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders (18 inferred) 349 343 8.7% 91.3% 2
Investment Company Matters Board 21 6 83.3% 16.7% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 9 9 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (4,293 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Lincoln Financial broke with the board (6,078 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Lincoln Financial filed 241,306 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 215,907 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 9,448 issuer names and 73 funds. They cover 112,773 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
5,810 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted3,216 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,704 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote890 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Lincoln Financial proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).