proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Goldman Sachs › 2024-2025

Goldman Sachs proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Goldman Sachs reported 198,958 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 156,505 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.7% of the time. On the 2,824 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 0.0% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.7% FOR of 156,505 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 146,661 AGAINST 6,189 Abstained or withheld 3,655

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

0.0% FOR of 2,824 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 2,813.

FOR 1 AGAINST 2,823 Abstained 0

See the 1 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Goldman Sachs, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (250 inferred) 101,986 97,430 96.7% 3.3% 3,614
Director Elections Shareholders (3 inferred) 82 28 75.0% 25.0% 54
Corporate Governance Board 16,639 16,516 94.9% 5.1% 93
Corporate Governance Shareholders (8 inferred) 1,803 1,793 25.7% 74.3% 4
Say-on-Pay Board (3,248 inferred) 16,523 15,140 93.2% 6.8% 3
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (14 inferred) 14 14 100.0% 0.0% 0
Audit-related Board 15,536 15,518 99.6% 0.4% 8
Audit-related Shareholders (13 inferred) 108 104 75.0% 25.0% 4
Compensation Board (73 inferred) 12,591 12,545 89.5% 10.5% 28
Compensation Shareholders (14 inferred) 477 472 9.5% 90.5% 5
Capital Structure Board 11,658 11,647 94.5% 5.5% 4
Capital Structure Shareholders 114 114 72.8% 27.2% 0
Other Social Issues Board 639 638 98.7% 1.3% 1
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,681 1,674 0.1% 99.9% 0
Environment or Climate Board 304 304 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,754 1,750 0.2% 99.8% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 229 229 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 1,024 1,024 0.3% 99.7% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 1,063 1,058 92.2% 7.8% 4
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (1 inferred) 2 2 50.0% 50.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 228 228 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 430 428 0.5% 99.5% 0
Other Board 493 490 53.3% 46.7% 3
Other Shareholders 104 103 21.4% 78.6% 1
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 420 405 94.6% 5.4% 15
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (4 inferred) 161 161 90.1% 9.9% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (3,628 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Goldman Sachs broke with the board (6,001 distinct proposals) →

What Goldman Sachs said it would do

The page above is what Goldman Sachs did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Goldman Sachs AM, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Goldman Sachs filed 198,958 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 180,590 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 8,684 issuer names and 74 funds. They cover 84,150 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
2,403 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted64 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,358 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate2 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote979 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 25, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Goldman Sachs proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.