proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Dimensional › 2024-2025

Dimensional proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Dimensional reported 1,017,110 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 746,628 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 86.5% of the time. On the 3,455 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 5.6% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

86.5% FOR of 746,628 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 645,614 AGAINST 71,376 Abstained or withheld 29,638

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

5.6% FOR of 3,455 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 3,424.

FOR 194 AGAINST 3,261 Abstained 0

See the 194 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Dimensional, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (8,760 inferred) 405,091 373,772 93.8% 6.2% 29,534
Director Elections Shareholders (134 inferred) 386 260 37.3% 62.7% 110
Corporate Governance Board 181,919 181,272 89.3% 10.7% 560
Corporate Governance Shareholders (26 inferred) 7,405 7,377 56.9% 43.1% 28
Capital Structure Board (14 inferred) 129,365 129,320 88.7% 11.3% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 1,765 1,759 94.0% 6.0% 0
Compensation Board (2,057 inferred) 103,607 103,372 78.1% 21.9% 223
Compensation Shareholders (149 inferred) 1,187 1,187 39.8% 60.2% 0
Audit-related Board 71,114 71,101 99.3% 0.7% 4
Audit-related Shareholders (15 inferred) 2,226 2,198 94.8% 5.2% 28
Say-on-Pay Board (3,160 inferred) 38,394 34,704 79.4% 20.6% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (16 inferred) 16 16 0.0% 100.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 17,021 17,017 73.1% 26.9% 4
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (17 inferred) 277 277 10.8% 89.2% 0
Other Board 6,766 6,379 91.1% 8.9% 387
Other Shareholders 1,032 1,032 54.6% 45.4% 0
Other Social Issues Board 3,527 3,527 91.7% 8.3% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 2,002 2,002 2.9% 97.1% 0
Environment or Climate Board 1,309 1,309 83.8% 16.2% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 2,440 2,437 6.9% 93.1% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 2,414 2,189 80.1% 19.9% 224
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (15 inferred) 260 260 93.1% 6.9% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 1,166 1,166 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 1,124 1,124 2.0% 98.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 1,097 1,097 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 623 623 3.4% 96.6% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 16 16 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 105 105 70.5% 29.5% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (14,363 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Dimensional broke with the board (6,073 distinct proposals) →

What Dimensional said it would do

The page above is what Dimensional did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Dimensional, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Dimensional filed 1,017,110 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 936,099 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 17,649 issuer names and 88 funds. They cover 177,841 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
5,654 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type3,688 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate1 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote1,965 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Dimensional proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.