proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › AllianceBernstein › 2024-2025

AllianceBernstein proxy voting record, 2024-2025

AllianceBernstein reported 97,314 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 75,518 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 90.1% of the time. On the 1,751 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 19.5% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

90.1% FOR of 75,518 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 68,069 AGAINST 5,472 Abstained or withheld 1,977

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

19.5% FOR of 1,751 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,751.

FOR 342 AGAINST 1,409 Abstained 13

See the 342 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

AllianceBernstein, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (247 inferred) 46,929 44,816 92.9% 7.1% 1,871
Director Elections Shareholders (4 inferred) 7 7 0.0% 100.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board 12,333 12,268 94.7% 5.3% 63
Corporate Governance Shareholders (5 inferred) 1,054 1,052 38.0% 62.0% 2
Capital Structure Board (1 inferred) 8,298 8,284 94.4% 5.6% 6
Capital Structure Shareholders 108 108 76.9% 23.1% 0
Compensation Board (82 inferred) 7,817 7,806 85.7% 14.3% 11
Compensation Shareholders (7 inferred) 275 275 33.5% 66.5% 0
Say-on-Pay Board (2,949 inferred) 6,675 6,176 87.4% 12.6% 2
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (4 inferred) 4 4 100.0% 0.0% 0
Audit-related Board 6,405 6,317 99.6% 0.4% 85
Audit-related Shareholders (3 inferred) 74 73 76.7% 23.3% 1
Other Social Issues Board 453 453 99.1% 0.9% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,075 1,068 14.5% 85.5% 7
Environment or Climate Board 235 235 99.1% 0.9% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,068 1,068 13.9% 86.1% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 166 166 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 581 581 9.8% 90.2% 0
Other Board 398 393 69.5% 30.5% 5
Other Shareholders 177 176 25.0% 75.0% 1
Extraordinary Transactions Board 552 535 91.2% 8.8% 17
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (1 inferred) 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 183 183 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 278 268 7.1% 92.9% 10
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 201 189 91.5% 8.5% 12
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (4 inferred) 66 66 95.5% 4.5% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 4 4 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (3,307 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where AllianceBernstein broke with the board (3,602 distinct proposals) →

What AllianceBernstein said it would do

The page above is what AllianceBernstein did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under AllianceBernstein, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
AllianceBernstein filed 97,314 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 91,476 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 4,184 issuer names and 51 funds. They cover 35,185 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
752 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type497 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote255 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

AllianceBernstein proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.