proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › AllianceBernstein › 2023-2024

AllianceBernstein proxy voting record, 2023-2024

AllianceBernstein reported 112,262 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 84,970 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 91.5% of the time. On the 2,521 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 24.0% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

91.5% FOR of 84,970 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 77,738 AGAINST 5,492 Abstained or withheld 1,740

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

24.0% FOR of 2,521 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 2,296.

FOR 605 AGAINST 1,916 Abstained 56

See the 605 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

AllianceBernstein, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (246 inferred) 52,765 51,018 93.8% 6.2% 1,556
Director Elections Shareholders 75 23 91.3% 8.7% 52
Corporate Governance Board 15,672 15,596 94.9% 5.1% 67
Corporate Governance Shareholders (10 inferred) 1,145 1,139 49.9% 50.1% 6
Compensation Board (87 inferred) 9,764 9,753 87.0% 13.0% 9
Compensation Shareholders 312 312 18.9% 81.1% 0
Capital Structure Board 9,421 9,414 95.0% 5.0% 7
Capital Structure Shareholders 88 88 95.5% 4.5% 0
Say-on-Pay Board (3,052 inferred) 7,390 6,358 89.3% 10.7% 2
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (10 inferred) 10 5 100.0% 0.0% 0
Audit-related Board 6,789 6,687 99.7% 0.3% 102
Audit-related Shareholders (4 inferred) 102 99 77.8% 22.2% 3
Other Social Issues Board 511 511 99.0% 1.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,602 1,552 22.1% 77.9% 39
Environment or Climate Board 291 285 97.2% 2.8% 6
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,355 1,337 11.7% 88.3% 18
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 208 208 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 767 767 22.9% 77.1% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 208 208 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 640 640 13.4% 86.6% 0
Other Board 736 708 85.0% 15.0% 28
Other Shareholders 55 55 36.4% 63.6% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 590 521 84.1% 15.9% 69
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 279 266 91.7% 8.3% 11
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 60 59 76.3% 23.7% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (3,409 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where AllianceBernstein broke with the board (3,385 distinct proposals) →

What AllianceBernstein said it would do

The page above is what AllianceBernstein did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under AllianceBernstein, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
AllianceBernstein filed 112,262 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 105,860 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 4,275 issuer names and 48 funds. They cover 37,655 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
1,251 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,035 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote216 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

AllianceBernstein proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.