WARRIOR MET COAL INC. 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL: To adopt a resolution urging the Board of Directors to commission and oversee an assessment of the Company's respect for the internationally recognized human rights of freedom of association and collective bargaining.

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“9. Stockholder Proposal Relating to Assessment of the Company's Respect for the Human Rights of Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining”): 19,278,455 for, 22,526,844 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was not more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 46.1% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 111 asset managers below reported 11,430,937 for, 14,357,726 against, 2,565 abstained, 158,400 not voted, 18 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL: To elect six director nominees to the Board of Directors: Walter J. Scheller, III

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Walter J. Scheller, III”): 41,736,098 for, 19,560 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The stockholders elected each of the six director nominees to serve as directors until the Company's 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until a successor is duly elected and qualified.”
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 109 managers: 25,790,529 for, 136 against, 2,565 abstained, 158,400 not voted, 18 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 304,411 for.

Description as filed by funds: MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL: To elect six director nominees to the Board of Directors: Alan H. Schumacher

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Alan H. Schumacher”): 41,567,391 for, 187,704 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The stockholders elected each of the six director nominees to serve as directors until the Company's 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until a successor is duly elected and qualified.”
Support: 99.5% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 110 asset managers below reported 25,790,578 for, 136 against, 2,565 abstained, 158,400 not voted, 18 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 110 asset managers. See all 110 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL: To elect six director nominees to the Board of Directors: Ana B. Amicarella

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Ana B. Amicarella”): 41,437,960 for, 316,341 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The stockholders elected each of the six director nominees to serve as directors until the Company's 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until a successor is duly elected and qualified.”
Support: 99.2% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 110 asset managers below reported 25,614,275 for, 176,439 against, 2,565 abstained, 158,400 not voted, 18 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 110 asset managers. See all 110 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL: To elect six director nominees to the Board of Directors: J. Brett Harvey

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: J. Brett Harvey”): 34,006,891 for, 7,747,654 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The stockholders elected each of the six director nominees to serve as directors until the Company's 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until a successor is duly elected and qualified.”
Support: 81% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 110 asset managers below reported 20,159,075 for, 5,631,639 against, 2,565 abstained, 158,400 not voted, 18 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 110 asset managers. See all 110 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL: To elect six director nominees to the Board of Directors: Lisa M. Schnorr

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Lisa M. Schnorr”): 37,605,819 for, 4,148,928 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The stockholders elected each of the six director nominees to serve as directors until the Company's 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until a successor is duly elected and qualified.”
Support: 90% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 110 asset managers below reported 23,197,815 for, 2,592,899 against, 2,565 abstained, 158,400 not voted, 18 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 110 asset managers. See all 110 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL: To elect six director nominees to the Board of Directors: Stephen D. Williams

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Stephen D. Williams”): 41,667,092 for, 88,336 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The stockholders elected each of the six director nominees to serve as directors until the Company's 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until a successor is duly elected and qualified.”
Support: 99.7% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 110 asset managers below reported 25,790,578 for, 136 against, 2,565 abstained, 158,400 not voted, 18 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 110 asset managers. See all 110 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL: To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers.

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“2. Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation”): 27,530,647 for, 14,176,211 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission compensation disclosure rules.”
Support: 66% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 111 managers: 16,439,434 for, 9,560,653 against, 2,565 abstained, 158,400 not voted, 18 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 227 managers: 15,980,233 for, 5,658,813 against, 79,126 abstained, 2,510,187 not voted, 77,605 1 year. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL: To hold a non- binding advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 107 managers: 213,980 for, 152,023 abstained, 121,462 not voted, 23,706,544 1 year, 1,840,442 3 year, 18 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 207 managers: 529,258 for, 151,188 abstained, 2,510,187 not voted, 17,631,057 1 year, 230,058 3 year, 59,070 unknown, 42,000 2 year. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL: To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024.

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“4. Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”): 42,709,363 for, 1,004,686 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The stockholders ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2024.”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the votes cast (“majority of the votes cast”).

The 109 asset managers below reported 25,121,295 for, 594,844 against, 2,565 abstained, 121,462 not voted, 13,785 1 year, 18 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 109 asset managers. See all 109 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL: To adopt a resolution urging the Board of Directors to adopt a "golden parachute" severance agreement policy.

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“8. Stockholder Proposal Relating to "Golden Parachute" Severance Agreement Policy”): 1,622,501 for, 40,163,963 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was not more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 4% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Submit Severance Agreement (Change-in-Control) to Shareholder Vote” (5 managers, 58,739 for, 5,117,761 against, 36,938 not voted).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 106 managers: 812,219 for, 20,001,817 against, 2,565 abstained, 121,462 not voted, 18 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 7 managers: 1,200 for, 2,800,051 against.

Description as filed by funds: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL: To adopt a resolution urging the Board of Directors to adopt a "blank check" preferred stock amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation.

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“7. Stockholder Proposal Relating to "Blank Check" Preferred Stock Amendment”): 9,354,041 for, 32,489,351 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was not more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 22% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Amend Certificate of Incorporation to Prohibit the Issuance of Preferred Stock without Prior Shareholder Approval” (5 managers, 58,739 for, 5,117,761 against, 36,938 not voted).

The 105 asset managers below reported 3,720,695 for, 16,883,968 against, 2,565 abstained, 121,462 not voted, 18 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 105 asset managers. See all 105 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL: To adopt a resolution urging the Board of Directors to adopt a "poison pill" bylaw provision.

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“5. Stockholder Proposal Relating to "Poison Pill" Bylaw Provision”): 21,452,030 for, 20,388,628 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The stockholders voted to adopt a resolution urging the Board of Directors to adopt a "poison pill" bylaw provision.”
Support: 51.3% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Submit Shareholder Rights Plan (Poison Pill) to Shareholder Vote” (5 managers, 58,739 for, 5,117,761 against, 36,938 not voted).

The 105 asset managers below reported 10,454,201 for, 10,156,487 against, 2,565 abstained, 121,462 not voted, 18 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 105 asset managers. See all 105 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL: To adopt a resolution urging the Board of Directors to adopt a "proxy access" bylaw provision.

WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s own tally for this item (“6. Stockholder Proposal Relating to "Proxy Access" Bylaw Provision”): 41,529,048 for, 339,340 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed April 29, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The stockholders voted to adopt a resolution urging the Board of Directors to adopt a "proxy access" bylaw provision.”
Support: 99.1% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of WARRIOR MET COAL INC.’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Adopt Proxy Access Right” (5 managers, 5,176,500 for, 36,938 not voted).

The 104 asset managers below reported 20,591,218 for, 12,058 against, 2,565 abstained, 121,462 not voted, 18 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 104 asset managers. See all 104 in the interactive database.