Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To adopt and approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 6, 2025 (as it may be amended from time to time, the "Merger Agreement"), by and among the Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (the "Company"), Blazing Star Parent, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Parent"), Blazing Star Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and the other affiliates of Parent named therein, pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein and among other things, Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company with the Company surviving such merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the "Merger") (such proposal, the "Merger Agreement Proposal").

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“1. Merger Agreement Proposal. A proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein and among other things, Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company”): 608,730,038 for, 34,916,603 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed July 11, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The Merger Agreement was approved by the requisite votes of the Company's stockholders.”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the shares present or represented (“majority of the shares of Company Common Stock present”).

The 116 asset managers below reported 197,287,629 for, 229,221 against, 1 abstained, 505 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 116 asset managers. See all 116 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To adjourn the Special Meeting, from time to time, to a later date or dates if necessary or appropriate, including adjournments to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal (the "Adjournment Proposal").

The 109 asset managers below reported 186,050,685 for, 10,808,604 against, 1 abstained, 505 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 109 asset managers. See all 109 in the interactive database.

The 3 asset managers below reported 635,901 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 2 asset managers below reported 6,134 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, by nonbinding, advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for the Company's named executive officers in connection with the Merger (the "Merger-Related Compensation Proposal").

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 106 managers: 196,833,406 for, 6,402 against, 18,661 abstained, 525 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 629 managers: 219,282,521 for, 4,824,583 against, 51,446 withheld, 137,667 abstained, 27,953 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 3 managers: 635,901 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 10 managers: 1,363,054 for, 124,034 against.

The 11 asset managers below reported 19,123 for, 1,027 against, 33,882 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, by nonbinding, advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements FOR the Company's named executive officers in connection with the Merger.

The 2 asset managers below reported 10,681 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 2 asset managers below reported 4,644,087 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: _x000D_ To approve, by nonbinding, advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for the Company's named executive officers in connection with the Merger (the "Merger-Related Compensation Proposal").

The 2 asset managers below reported 6,066 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.