Veritex Holdings, Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To approve the merger of Veritex Holdings, Inc. ("Veritex") with and into Huntington Bancshares Incorporated ("Huntington"), as contemplated by the merger proposal, dated as of July 13, 2025 (as it may be amended time to time), by and between Huntington and Veritex, with Huntington as the surviving corporation (the "Veritex merger proposal").

Veritex Holdings, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“1. Veritex Merger Proposal To approve the merger of Veritex with and into Huntington, as contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as July 13, 2025, by and between Huntington and Veritex, under which Verite”): 44,263,668 for, 9,700 against, per its Form 8-K filed September 23, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 89 asset managers below reported 20,605,627 for.

Showing the 25 largest of 89 asset managers. See all 89 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve the adjournment of special meeting of Veritex shareholders, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if, immediately prior to such adjournment, there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Veritex special meeting to approve the Veritex merger proposal or the Veritex authorized share count proposal or to ensure that any supplement or amendment to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus is timely provided to holders of Veritex common stock (the "Veritex adjournment proposal").

Veritex Holdings, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 3: approved, the adjournment of the Special Shareholder Meeting was not necessary because Veritex's shareholders approved Proposal 1. The table below contains a summary of the number of votes for, votes against ”): 43,253,950 for, 630,531 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed September 23, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “the adjournment of the Special Shareholder Meeting was not necessary because Veritex's shareholders approved ”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 81 asset managers below reported 20,155,826 for, 78,106 against, 1 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 81 asset managers. See all 81 in the interactive database.

The 5 asset managers below reported 368,011 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: TO APPROVE THE ADJOURNMENT OF SPECIAL MEETING OF VERITEX SHAREHOLDERS, IF NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE, TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES IF, IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO SUCH ADJOURNMENT, THERE ARE NOT SUFFICIENT VOTES AT THE TIME OF THE VERITEX SPECIAL MEETING TO APPROVE THE VERITEX MERGER PROPOSAL OR THE VERITEX AUTHORIZED SHARE COUNT PROPOSAL OR TO ENSURE THAT ANY SUPPLEMENT OR AMENDMENT TO THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS IS TIMELY PROVIDED TO HOLDERS OF VERITEX COMMON STOCK (THE VERITEX ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL"). "

Veritex Holdings, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 3: approved, the adjournment of the Special Shareholder Meeting was not necessary because Veritex's shareholders approved Proposal 1. The table below contains a summary of the number of votes for, votes against ”): 43,253,950 for, 630,531 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed September 23, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “the adjournment of the Special Shareholder Meeting was not necessary because Veritex's shareholders approved ”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 2 managers: 391 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 254 for.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, on an advisory (non- binding) basis, the merger-related named executive officer compensation that will or may be paid to Veritex's named executive officers in connection with the merger (the "Veritex compensation proposal").

Veritex Holdings, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“2. Veritex Compensation Proposal To approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the merger-related named executive officer compensation that will or may be paid to Veritex's named executive officers in connection with t”): 35,806,269 for, 8,015,286 against, per its Form 8-K filed September 23, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 82% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 85 managers: 17,042,170 for, 3,467,731 against, 1 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 217 managers: 19,479,552 for, 4,334,937 against, 10,087 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

The 6 asset managers below reported 351,386 for, 18,726 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.