Veris Residential, Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To approve the transactions contemplated by that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 23, 2026 (as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time in accordance with its terms, the "Merger Agreement"), by and among Veris Residential, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), AC Residential Acquisition LP, a Delaware limited partnership ("Parent"), AC Residential REIT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Merger Sub I"), AC Residential OP LP, a Delaware limited partnership ("Merger Sub II"), and Veris Residential, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and the operating partnership of the Company (the "Company Partnership"), a copy of which is attached as Annex A to the accompanying proxy statement, pursuant to which, among other things, (i) the Company will merge with and into Merger Sub I (the "Merger"), with Merger Sub I continuing as the surviving entity in the Merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, and (ii) Merger Sub II will merge with and into the Company Partnership (the "Partnership Merger" and together with the Merger, the "Mergers"), with the Company Partnership continuing as the surviving entity in the Partnership Merger (such transactions, the "Transactions") (the "Merger Proposal").

Veris Residential, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“1. Merger Agreement Proposal As previously announced, on February 23, 2026, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time in accordance w”): 76,820,975 for, 18,230 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed May 21, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1: Merger Agreement Proposal As previously announced, on February 23, 2026, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time in accordance with its terms, the "Merger Agreement"), by and among the Company, AC R…”
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 71 asset managers below reported 34,609,763 for, 51,593 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 71 asset managers. See all 71 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: TO ADJOURN THE SPECIAL MEETING TO A LATER DATE OR TIME IF NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE TO ENSURE THAT ANY NECESSARY SUPPLEMENT OR AMENDMENT TO THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT IS PROVIDED TO COMPANY STOCKHOLDERS A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME IN ADVANCE OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OR TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES IN FAVOR OF THE MERGER PROPOSAL IF THERE ARE INSUFFICIENT VOTES AT THE TIME OF THE SPECIAL MEETING TO APPROVE THE MERGER PROPOSAL.

The 71 asset managers below reported 33,056,642 for, 1,529,459 against, 75,253 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 71 asset managers. See all 71 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, by a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the Company's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the Transactions, including the Mergers.

Veris Residential, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 2: Merger-Related Compensation Proposal At the Special Meeting, the Company's stockholders voted upon and did not approve the proposal to approve, by a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation that may be pai”): 34,475,130 for, 42,329,272 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed May 21, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2: Merger-Related Compensation Proposal At the Special Meeting, the Company's stockholders voted upon and did not approve the proposal to approve, by a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the Company's named executive officers that is based on …”
Support: 45% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 72 managers: 14,222,017 for, 20,415,947 against, 23,660 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 204 managers: 14,971,539 for, 24,538,631 against, 3,554 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 1 managers: 151,729 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 3 managers: 90,818 against.