URSTADT BIDDLE PROPERTIES INC. 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Merger Proposal: To approve, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 17, 2023, by and among Regency Centers Corporation ("Regency"), Hercules Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Regency ("Merger Sub"), Urstadt Biddle, UB Maryland I, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Urstadt Biddle ("UB Sub I"), and UB Maryland II, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of UB Sub I ("UB Sub II"), the mergers of (i) UB Sub II with and into Urstadt Biddle, with Urstadt Biddle surviving the first merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of UB Sub I ("first merger"), and (ii) following the first merger, UB Sub I with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub surviving the second merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Regency (the "second merger" and together with the first merger, the "mergers"), and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

URSTADT BIDDLE PROPERTIES INC.’s own tally for this item (“1. Merger Proposal. To approve, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 17, 2023, by and among Regency, Hercules Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Regency ("Merger Sub"), Urstadt Biddle,”): 10,026,048 for, 29,910 against, per its Form 8-K filed August 17, 2023 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.7% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund share totals are not shown for this item: fund-reported shares overlap across filings (an adviser and the funds it manages can each report the same shares), and here their sum exceeds the total votes cast at the meeting.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Adjournment Proposal: To approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in favor of the Merger Proposal.

URSTADT BIDDLE PROPERTIES INC.’s own tally for this item (“3. Adjournment Proposal. To approve one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in favor of the Merger Proposal”): 9,887,328 for, 167,138 against, per its Form 8-K filed August 17, 2023 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund share totals are not shown for this item: fund-reported shares overlap across filings (an adviser and the funds it manages can each report the same shares), and here their sum exceeds the total votes cast at the meeting.

Showing the 25 largest of 76 asset managers. See all 76 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Compensation Proposal: To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Urstadt Biddle's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the mergers.

URSTADT BIDDLE PROPERTIES INC.’s own tally for this item (“2. Compensation Proposal. To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Urstadt Biddle's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger”): 9,117,270 for, 922,413 against, per its Form 8-K filed August 17, 2023 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 91% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

No total is shown for the fund voting reports: their sum exceeds the total votes cast at the meeting. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

No total is shown for the institutional-manager reports: their sum exceeds the total votes cast at the meeting. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 1 managers: 23,891 not voted.

Institutional-manager reports, all 3 managers: 2,641 for, 163,426 against.