Starbucks Corporation 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Andy Campion

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Andy Campion”): 764,749,951 for, 110,976,652 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting and the voting results of such matters are as follows: Proposal 1 - Election of Directors The Company's shareholders elected each of the eleven directors nominated by the Company's Board of Directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Sha…”
Support: 87% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 388,552,428 for, 86,060,076 against, 38,925 abstained, 867 not voted, 1,648 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Beth Ford

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Beth Ford”): 808,145,942 for, 66,979,908 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting and the voting results of such matters are as follows: Proposal 1 - Election of Directors The Company's shareholders elected each of the eleven directors nominated by the Company's Board of Directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Sha…”
Support: 92% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 471,911,645 for, 2,700,856 against, 38,929 abstained, 867 not voted, 1,648 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Brian Niccol

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Brian Niccol”): 830,353,482 for, 43,094,658 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting and the voting results of such matters are as follows: Proposal 1 - Election of Directors The Company's shareholders elected each of the eleven directors nominated by the Company's Board of Directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Sha…”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 472,139,205 for, 2,473,290 against, 38,937 abstained, 867 not voted, 1,648 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Dambisa Moyo

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Dambisa Moyo”): 864,744,438 for, 11,015,863 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting and the voting results of such matters are as follows: Proposal 1 - Election of Directors The Company's shareholders elected each of the eleven directors nominated by the Company's Board of Directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Sha…”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 474,568,326 for, 44,180 against, 38,925 abstained, 867 not voted, 1,648 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Jorgen Vig Knudstorp

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Jørgen Vig Knudstorp”): 828,586,462 for, 46,185,327 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting and the voting results of such matters are as follows: Proposal 1 - Election of Directors The Company's shareholders elected each of the eleven directors nominated by the Company's Board of Directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Sha…”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 473,471,664 for, 1,140,839 against, 38,931 abstained, 867 not voted, 1,648 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Marissa Mayer

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Marissa Mayer”): 867,967,230 for, 7,925,365 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting and the voting results of such matters are as follows: Proposal 1 - Election of Directors The Company's shareholders elected each of the eleven directors nominated by the Company's Board of Directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Sha…”
Support: 99.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 474,546,482 for, 66,024 against, 38,925 abstained, 867 not voted, 1,648 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Mike Sievert

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Mike Sievert”): 863,809,451 for, 11,894,524 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting and the voting results of such matters are as follows: Proposal 1 - Election of Directors The Company's shareholders elected each of the eleven directors nominated by the Company's Board of Directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Sha…”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 474,589,965 for, 22,541 against, 38,925 abstained, 867 not voted, 1,648 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Neal Mohan

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Neal Mohan”): 865,313,815 for, 10,401,952 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting and the voting results of such matters are as follows: Proposal 1 - Election of Directors The Company's shareholders elected each of the eleven directors nominated by the Company's Board of Directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Sha…”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 474,569,472 for, 43,034 against, 38,925 abstained, 867 not voted, 1,648 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Ritch Allison

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Ritch Allison”): 846,955,724 for, 28,832,837 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting and the voting results of such matters are as follows: Proposal 1 - Election of Directors The Company's shareholders elected each of the eleven directors nominated by the Company's Board of Directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Sha…”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 472,686,749 for, 1,925,758 against, 38,925 abstained, 867 not voted, 1,648 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Wei Zhang

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Wei Zhang”): 855,876,306 for, 19,854,913 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting and the voting results of such matters are as follows: Proposal 1 - Election of Directors The Company's shareholders elected each of the eleven directors nominated by the Company's Board of Directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Sha…”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 472,884,896 for, 1,727,611 against, 38,925 abstained, 867 not voted, 1,648 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Daniel Servitje

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Daniel Servitje”): 841,710,171 for, 33,992,034 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting and the voting results of such matters are as follows: Proposal 1 - Election of Directors The Company's shareholders elected each of the eleven directors nominated by the Company's Board of Directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Sha…”
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 208 asset managers below reported 471,544,244 for, 716,226 against, 38,925 abstained, 867 not voted, 1,648 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 208 asset managers. See all 208 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers ("say-on-pay")

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 2: Advisory Resolution on Executive Compensation At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders approved, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers”): 774,932,476 for, 99,362,557 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2 - Advisory Resolution on Executive Compensation At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders approved, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers.”
Support: 89% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 201 managers: 466,368,365 for, 8,187,798 against, 69,204 abstained, 898 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1,162 managers: 525,254,108 for, 66,606,794 against, 155 withheld, 543,140 abstained, 72,502 not voted, 18,391 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Ratification of selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 3: Ratification of the Selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 2026 At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders approved the ratification of ”): 965,325,253 for, 38,304,225 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 3 - Ratification of the Selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 2026 At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders approved the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered…”
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Starbucks Corporation’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Ratify Appointment of Independent Auditors” (6 managers, 33,454 for, 4,381 against).

The 213 asset managers below reported 474,199,886 for, 406,229 against, 38,924 abstained, 867 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 213 asset managers. See all 213 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Shareholder proposal requesting a report on median compensation and benefits gaps as they address reproductive and gender dysphoria care

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 7: Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Report on Median Compensation and Benefits Gaps as They Address Reproductive and Gender Dysphoria Care At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders did not approve a shareholder p”): 5,153,879 for, 864,501,617 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 7 - Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Report on Median Compensation and Benefits Gaps as They Address Reproductive and Gender Dysphoria Care At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders did not approve a shareholder proposal requesting a report on median compensation and benefits gaps as they a…”
Support: 0.6% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 223 asset managers below reported 211,961 for, 474,139,007 against, 495,020 abstained, 867 not voted, 4,405 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 223 asset managers. See all 223 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Shareholder proposal requesting a report on the Company's use of diagnostic tools created by politicized corporate partners

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 8: Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Report on the Company's Use of Diagnostic Tools Created by Politicized Corporate Partners At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders did not approve a shareholder proposal reque”): 6,335,450 for, 863,459,994 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 8 - Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Report on the Company's Use of Diagnostic Tools Created by Politicized Corporate Partners At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders did not approve a shareholder proposal requesting a report on the Company's use of diagnostic tools created by politicized…”
Support: 0.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Starbucks Corporation’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “S/H Proposal - Corporate Governance” (3 managers, 15,725 for, 15,396 against).

The 217 asset managers below reported 334,005 for, 473,959,017 against, 407,362 abstained, 867 not voted, 4,405 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Shareholder proposal requesting a report on the risks of the Company excluding religious charities from its employee-gift match program

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 9: Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Report on the Risks of the Company Excluding Religious Charities from its Employee-Gift Match Program At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders did not approve a shareholder pr”): 5,749,240 for, 864,268,337 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 9 - Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Report on the Risks of the Company Excluding Religious Charities from its Employee-Gift Match Program At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders did not approve a shareholder proposal requesting a report on the risks of the Company excluding religious cha…”
Support: 0.7% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 376,945 for, 473,889,336 against, 434,103 abstained, 867 not voted, 4,405 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Shareholder proposal requesting a report on the Company's apparent exclusion of detransitioning in its healthcare coverage

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 6: Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Report on the Company's Apparent Exclusion of Detransitioning in its Healthcare Coverage At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders did not approve a shareholder proposal reques”): 8,169,593 for, 861,170,343 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 6 - Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Report on the Company's Apparent Exclusion of Detransitioning in its Healthcare Coverage At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders did not approve a shareholder proposal requesting a report on the Company's apparent exclusion of detransitioning in its he…”
Support: 1.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 214 asset managers below reported 281,324 for, 473,979,807 against, 434,105 abstained, 867 not voted, 4,405 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 214 asset managers. See all 214 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Shareholder proposal requesting adoption of an independent board chair policy

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 5: Shareholder Proposal Requesting Adoption of an Independent Board Chair Policy At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders did not approve a shareholder proposal requesting adoption of an independent board chair p”): 107,793,749 for, 763,797,502 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 5 - Shareholder Proposal Requesting Adoption of an Independent Board Chair Policy At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders did not approve a shareholder proposal requesting adoption of an independent board chair policy.”
Support: 12% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Starbucks Corporation’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Adopt Mandatory Policy Separating the Roles of CEO and Board Chair” (6 managers, 2,347,653 against).

The 210 asset managers below reported 11,407,922 for, 460,901,483 against, 38,945 abstained, 867 not voted, 4,405 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 210 asset managers. See all 210 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Shareholder proposal requesting supermajority shareholder voting requirements be replaced with majority voting requirements

Starbucks Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 4: Shareholder Proposal Requesting Supermajority Shareholder Voting Requirements be Replaced with Majority Voting Requirements At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders approved a shareholder proposal requesting s”): 823,985,324 for, 17,573,051 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed March 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 4 - Shareholder Proposal Requesting Supermajority Shareholder Voting Requirements be Replaced with Majority Voting Requirements At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders approved a shareholder proposal requesting supermajority shareholder voting requirements be replaced with majority voting …”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 210 asset managers below reported 470,848,453 for, 549,620 against, 890,248 abstained, 52,473 not voted, 12,605 unknown, 224 mixed.

Showing the 25 largest of 210 asset managers. See all 210 in the interactive database.