SpartanNash Company 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 22, 2025, by and among SpartanNash Company, New Mackinac HoldCo, Inc., Mackinac Merger Sub, Inc. and C&S Wholesale Grocers, LLC (as may be amended or modified from time to time, the "Merger Agreement").

The 77 asset managers below reported 14,840,345 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approve Merger Agreement

SpartanNash Company’s own tally for this item (“1. Merger Proposal At the Special Meeting, the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement (the "Merger Proposal")”): 27,800,718 for, 151,523 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed September 9, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1: The Merger Proposal At the Special Meeting, the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement (the "Merger Proposal") was approved, having received "for" votes from holders of at least a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on the action at the Speci…”
Support: 99.4% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the shares outstanding (“majority of the issued and outstanding”).

The 6 asset managers below reported 117,775 for, 24,793 not voted.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVE THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, DATED AS OF JUNE 22, 2025, BY AND AMONG SPARTANNASH COMPANY, NEW MACKINAC HOLDCO, INC., MACKINAC MERGER SUB, INC. AND C&S WHOLESALE GROCERS, LLC (AS MAY BE AMENDED OR MODIFIED FROM TIME TO TIME, THE MERGER AGREEMENT"). "

The 2 asset managers below reported 838 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVE THE ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETING FROM TIME TO TIME, IF NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE, INCLUDING TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES IF THERE ARE INSUFFICIENT VOTES AT THE TIME OF THE SPECIAL MEETING TO APPROVE PROPOSAL 1 (TO APPROVE THE MERGER AGREEMENT) OR IN THE ABSENCE OF A QUORUM.

SpartanNash Company’s own tally for this item (“3. The Adjournment Proposal At the Special Meeting, SpartanNash's shareholders voted upon the proposal to approve an adjournment of the Special Meeting, from time to time, if necessary or appropriate, including to solici”): 26,489,115 for, 1,454,376 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed September 9, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The Adjournment Proposal was approved, having received "for" votes from holders of at least a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on the action at the Special Meeting.”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the votes cast (“majority of the votes cast”).

The 80 asset managers below reported 14,286,497 for, 561,857 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

The 6 asset managers below reported 117,775 for, 24,793 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, certain compensation that will or may be paid by SpartanNash to SpartanNash's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the Merger.

SpartanNash Company’s own tally for this item (“2. The Compensation Proposal At the Special Meeting, SpartanNash's shareholders voted upon the proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that will or may be paid by SpartanNash to its named ”): 23,847,424 for, 4,067,271 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed September 9, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The Compensation Proposal was approved, having received "for" votes from holders of at least a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on the action at the Special Meeting.”
Support: 85% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the votes cast (“majority of the votes cast”).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 80 managers: 13,061,794 for, 1,786,562 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 197 managers: 10,690,417 for, 3,187,348 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 7 managers: 198,784 for, 24,793 not voted.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 150 for, 2,373 against.