SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORP. 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: The Merger Agreement Proposal - To adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement"), entered into by and among Six Flags Entertainment Corporation ("Six Flags"), Cedar Fair, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Cedar Fair"), CopperSteel HoldCo, Inc., a Delaware corporation and subsidiary of Six Flags and Cedar Fair ("CopperSteel") and CopperSteel Copper Merger Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of CopperSteel ("Copper Merger Sub"), providing for a merger of equals through (i) the merger of Copper Merger Sub with and into Cedar Fair (the "Cedar Fair First Merger"), with Cedar Fair continuing its existence as the surviving entity following the Cedar Fair First Merger as a direct subsidiary of CopperSteel (the "Cedar Fair Surviving Entity"), (ii) the subsequent merger of the Cedar Fair Surviving Entity with and into CopperSteel (the "Cedar Fair Second Merger" and together with the Cedar Fair First Merger, the "Cedar Fair Mergers"), with CopperSteel continuing as the surviving corporation, and (iii) the merger of Six Flags with and into CopperSteel, with CopperSteel continuing as the surviving corporation (the "Six Flags Merger" and together with the Cedar Fair Mergers, the "Mergers") (the "Merger Agreement Proposal").

SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORP.’s own tally for this item (“Merger Agreement Proposal”): 67,360,372 for, 195,471 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 12, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.7% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 74 asset managers below reported 28,064,025 for, 74,420 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 74 asset managers. See all 74 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: The Adjournment Proposal - To adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary, to a later date or dates at the determination of the Board of Directors, including to solicit additional proxies in favor of the Merger Agreement Proposal if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal or to ensure that any supplement or amendment to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus is timely provided to stockholders (the "Adjournment Proposal").

The 62 asset managers below reported 23,660,141 for, 2,608,062 against, 79,893 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 62 asset managers. See all 62 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: The Adjournment Proposal- To adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary, to a later date or dates at the determination of the board of directors, including to solicit additional proxies in favor of the Merger Agreement Proposal if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal or to ensure that any supplement or amendment to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus is timely provided to Six Flags Stockholders (the ''Adjournment Proposal'')

The 9 asset managers below reported 1,723,583 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 2 asset managers below reported 58,181 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: The Compensation Advisory Proposal - To approve, on a non- binding advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Six Flags' named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the Mergers (the "Compensation Advisory Proposal").

SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORP.’s own tally for this item (“Compensation Advisory Proposal”): 33,261,002 for, 33,854,108 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed March 12, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “Compensation Advisory Proposal”
Support: 49.6% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 70 managers: 8,126,101 for, 19,940,005 against, 5,473 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 211 managers: 18,271,444 for, 18,976,744 against, 476,646 abstained, 40,587 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 2 managers: 58,181 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 4 managers: 13 for, 184,237 against.