Seadrill Limited 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect, by way of separate resolutions, each of the following persons as Directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws. Andrew Schultz

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Andrew Schultz”): 31,593,085 for, 11,963,111 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2: Re-Election of Directors The following director nominees were re-elected as directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws, with the vote totals as …”
Support: 73% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 63 managers: 10,657,231 for, 4,634,488 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 207,561 for.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect, by way of separate resolutions, each of the following persons as Directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws. Harry Quarls

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Harry Quarls”): 43,320,724 for, 27,413 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2: Re-Election of Directors The following director nominees were re-elected as directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws, with the vote totals as …”
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 64 asset managers below reported 15,296,639 for, 1 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 64 asset managers. See all 64 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect, by way of separate resolutions, each of the following persons as Directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws. Jonathan Swinney

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Jonathan Swinney”): 43,322,316 for, 26,251 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2: Re-Election of Directors The following director nominees were re-elected as directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws, with the vote totals as …”
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 64 asset managers below reported 15,296,639 for, 1 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 64 asset managers. See all 64 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect, by way of separate resolutions, each of the following persons as Directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws. Julie J. Robertson

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Julie J. Robertson”): 42,869,683 for, 480,632 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2: Re-Election of Directors The following director nominees were re-elected as directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws, with the vote totals as …”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 64 asset managers below reported 15,291,003 for, 5,636 against, 1 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 64 asset managers. See all 64 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect, by way of separate resolutions, each of the following persons as Directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws. Mark McCollum

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Mark McCollum”): 43,322,502 for, 26,123 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2: Re-Election of Directors The following director nominees were re-elected as directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws, with the vote totals as …”
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 64 asset managers below reported 15,296,639 for, 1 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 64 asset managers. See all 64 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect, by way of separate resolutions, each of the following persons as Directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws. Paul Smith

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Paul Smith”): 42,802,976 for, 545,658 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2: Re-Election of Directors The following director nominees were re-elected as directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws, with the vote totals as …”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 64 asset managers below reported 15,291,322 for, 5,318 against, 1 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 64 asset managers. See all 64 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect, by way of separate resolutions, each of the following persons as Directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws. Ana Zambelli

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Ana Zambelli”): 43,222,425 for, 126,203 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2: Re-Election of Directors The following director nominees were re-elected as directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws, with the vote totals as …”
Support: 99.7% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 63 asset managers below reported 15,291,717 for, 1 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 63 asset managers. See all 63 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect, by way of separate resolutions, each of the following persons as Directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws. Jean Cahuzac

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Jean Cahuzac”): 43,082,539 for, 266,289 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2: Re-Election of Directors The following director nominees were re-elected as directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws, with the vote totals as …”
Support: 99.3% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 63 asset managers below reported 15,058,191 for, 233,527 against, 1 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 63 asset managers. See all 63 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect, by way of separate resolutions, each of the following persons as Directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws. Jan Kjaervik

The 47 asset managers below reported 12,062,309 for, 17 against, 1 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 47 asset managers. See all 47 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect, by way of separate resolutions, each of the following. persons as Directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws. Jan Kjærvik

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Jan Kjærvik”): 38,603,335 for, 4,745,978 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2: Re-Election of Directors The following director nominees were re-elected as directors of the Company to serve until the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their respective offices are otherwise vacated in accordance with the Bye-laws, with the vote totals as …”
Support: 89% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 17 asset managers below reported 3,234,313 for.

Description as filed by funds: To determine that the number of Directors comprising the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Seadrill Limited (the "Company") be set at up to nine (9) Directors until such number is determined or changed in accordance with the Bye-laws of the Company (the "Bye-laws") and to authorize the Board to fill any vacancy on the Board left unfilled at any general meeting of shareholders.

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“1. Number of Directors The determination that the number of directors comprising the Board be set at up to nine (9) directors until such number is determined or changed in accordance with the Bye-laws of the Company (the”): 43,175,908 for, 173,864 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1: Number of Directors The determination that the number of directors comprising the Board be set at up to nine (9) directors until such number is determined or changed in accordance with the Bye-laws of the Company (the "Bye-laws") and the authorization of the Board to fill any vacancy on…”
Support: 99.5% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 63 asset managers below reported 14,828,125 for, 84,844 against, 1 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 63 asset managers. See all 63 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: TO APPROVE AND RATIFY THE REMUNERATION OF THE DIRECTORS.

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“4. Approval and Ratification of the Remuneration of Directors The remuneration of the directors described in the Proxy Statement”): 43,328,331 for, 15,251 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 4: Approval and Ratification of the Remuneration of Directors The remuneration of the directors described in the Proxy Statement was approved and ratified, with the vote totals as set forth in the table below:”
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 62 managers: 14,912,968 for, 1 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 3 managers: 5,825,234 for.

Description as filed by funds: To approve Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Seadrill Limited 2022 Management Incentive Plan.

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“6. Approval of Amendment No”): 41,146,428 for, 2,201,541 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 6: Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Seadrill Limited 2022 Management Incentive Plan Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Seadrill Limited 2022 Management Incentive Plan was approved, with the vote totals as set forth in the table below:”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 63 managers: 13,529,515 for, 1,383,456 against, 1 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,106,149 for.

Description as filed by funds: To conduct an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers for 2025.

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“5. Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers The advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers for 2025”): 41,033,521 for, 2,310,244 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 5: Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers The advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers for 2025 was approved, with the vote totals as set forth in the table below:”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 64 managers: 13,908,083 for, 1,388,556 against, 1 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 189 managers: 25,354,317 for, 1,926,788 against, 1,226,868 abstained, 94 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, United States ("PWC US"), to serve as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026 and until the close of the Company's next annual general meeting of shareholders thereafter and the authorization of the Board (acting through the Audit and Risk Committee of the Board) to determine the remuneration of PWC US.

Seadrill Limited’s own tally for this item (“3. Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, United States ("PwC US"), to serve as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the”): 47,223,781 for, 79,918 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 5, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 3: Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, United States ("PwC US"), to serve as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026 and until the close of the Compa…”
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 63 asset managers below reported 14,905,759 for, 7,210 against, 1 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 63 asset managers. See all 63 in the interactive database.