R1 RCM Inc. 2024-2025 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 31, 2024, by and among R1 RCM Inc. (the "Company"), Raven Acquisition Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Parent"), and Project Raven Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), pursuant to which Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent and approve the transactions contemplated thereby (the "Merger").

R1 RCM Inc.’s own tally for this item (“A proposal to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the transactions contemplated thereby”): 377,486,987 for, 2,477,176 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed November 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “At the Special Meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved a proposal to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the transactions contemplated thereby.”
Support: 99.3% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a supermajority of the shares outstanding (“91.92% of all outstanding”).

The 81 asset managers below reported 41,254,776 for, 24 against, 1 withheld.

Showing the 25 largest of 81 asset managers. See all 81 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, certain compensation arrangements for the Company's named executive officers in connection with the Merger.

R1 RCM Inc.’s own tally for this item (“A proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for the Company’s named executive officers in connection with the Merger”): 364,416,611 for, 15,044,874 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed November 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “At the Special Meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved, on an advisory and non-binding basis, a proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for the Company’s named executive officers in connection with the Merger.”
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 77 managers: 33,680,600 for, 6,993,513 against, 4 withheld, 50,739 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 212 managers: 194,529,200 for, 11,473,517 against, 8,539,931 abstained, 65 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 3 managers: 529,886 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 5 managers: 3,957,401 for, 38 against.