POWER CORPORATION OF CANADA 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

The 57 asset managers below reported 44,180,496 for, 19,519,560 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 62,306,428 for, 1,393,628 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 63,700,056 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 63,700,056 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 62,945,598 for, 754,458 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 63,700,056 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 58,817,018 for, 4,883,038 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 63,700,056 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 63,700,056 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 63,700,056 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 63,700,056 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 63,700,056 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 63,700,056 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

The 57 asset managers below reported 63,700,056 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 57 asset managers. See all 57 in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 12 managers: 2,749,603 for, 58,772 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 55 managers: 31,755,067 for, 820,433 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 42 managers: 59,443,908 for, 19,200 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 4 managers: 6,703,448 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 3 managers: 1,428,573 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 3 managers: 4,839,812 for.

The 42 asset managers below reported 59,443,908 for, 19,200 withheld. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 42 asset managers. See all 42 in the interactive database.

The 12 asset managers below reported 2,808,375 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 3 asset managers below reported 1,428,573 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 44 asset managers below reported 19,200 for, 59,489,700 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 44 asset managers. See all 44 in the interactive database.

The 42 asset managers below reported 728,684 for, 58,734,424 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 42 asset managers. See all 42 in the interactive database.

The 42 asset managers below reported 2,224,137 for, 57,238,971 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 42 asset managers. See all 42 in the interactive database.

The 42 asset managers below reported 59,463,108 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 42 asset managers. See all 42 in the interactive database.

The 42 asset managers below reported 1,307,922 for, 58,155,186 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 42 asset managers. See all 42 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS RESOLUTION IS A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL: IT IS PROPOSED THAT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CONSIDER THE ADVISABILITY OF INTRODUCING A NEW APPROACH TO INCENTIVE COMPENSATION, WITH THE AIM OF LINKING PART OF THE COMPENSATION OF ALL EMPLOYEES TO THE ORGANIZATION'S PERFORMANCE AGAINST ITS KEY ESG TARGETS

The 10 asset managers below reported 548,739 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS RESOLUTION IS A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL: IT IS PROPOSED THAT THE CORPORATION ADOPT A POLICY REGARDING AN ANNUAL ADVISORY VOTE ON ITS ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE OBJECTIVES AND ACTION PLAN

The 10 asset managers below reported 83,132 for, 465,607 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS RESOLUTION IS A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL: IT IS PROPOSED THAT THE CORPORATION'S ANNUAL MEETINGS BE HELD IN PERSON, AND THAT VIRTUAL MEETINGS BE ADDED AS A COMPLEMENT TO, BUT NOT REPLACE, IN-PERSON MEETINGS

The 10 asset managers below reported 105,857 for, 442,882 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS RESOLUTION IS A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL: IT IS PROPOSED THAT THE LANGUAGE FLUENCY OF THE EXECUTIVES BE DISCLOSED IN THE PROXY CIRCULAR

The 10 asset managers below reported 548,739 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS RESOLUTION IS A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL: RESOLVED: THE CORPORATION ANNUALLY DISCLOSE ITS FULL SCOPE 1-3 FINANCED EMISSIONS USING ACCEPTED STANDARDS AND IN ABSOLUTE TERMS

The 10 asset managers below reported 93,498 for, 455,241 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 3 asset managers below reported 1,428,573 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 3 asset managers below reported 1,360,373 for, 68,200 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 3 asset managers below reported 68,200 for, 1,360,373 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 3 asset managers below reported 1,428,573 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 3 asset managers below reported 1,428,573 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 3 asset managers below reported 3,726 for, 2,255,910 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 3 asset managers below reported 2,259,636 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 3 asset managers below reported 2,159,030 for, 100,606 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 3 asset managers below reported 2,259,636 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 3 asset managers below reported 2,155,220 for, 104,416 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.