PotlatchDeltic Corporation 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: The PotlatchDeltic merger agreement proposal: A proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger (as it may be amended from time to time, the "merger agreement"), dated as of October 13, 2025, by and among PotlatchDeltic Corporation ("PotlatchDeltic"), Rayonier Inc. ("Rayonier"), and Redwood Merger Sub, LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Rayonier ("Merger Sub"), pursuant to which PotlatchDeltic will be merged with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub continuing as the surviving entity (the "merger") (the "PotlatchDeltic merger agreement proposal").

PotlatchDeltic Corporation’s own tally for this item (“1. PotlatchDeltic Merger Agreement Proposal Proposal 1 considered at the Special Meeting was a proposal to approve the adoption of the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which PotlatchDeltic will be merged with and into Merge”): 65,171,046 for, 79,564 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed January 27, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1: PotlatchDeltic Merger Agreement Proposal Proposal 1 considered at the Special Meeting was a proposal to approve the adoption of the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which PotlatchDeltic will be merged with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub continuing as the surviving entity (the " Potla…”
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 83 asset managers below reported 29,636,040 for, 109,315 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 83 asset managers. See all 83 in the interactive database.

The 2 asset managers below reported 213,066 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: The PotlatchDeltic adjournment proposal: A proposal to adjourn the special meeting from time to time, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in the event there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the PotlatchDeltic merger agreement proposal.

The 82 asset managers below reported 27,560,078 for, 2,060,755 against, 120,889 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 82 asset managers. See all 82 in the interactive database.

The 2 asset managers below reported 213,066 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: The PotlatchDeltic merger-related compensation proposal: A proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the named executive officers of PotlatchDeltic in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

PotlatchDeltic Corporation’s own tally for this item (“2. PotlatchDeltic Merger-Related Compensation Proposal Proposal 2 considered at the Special Meeting was a proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Potla”): 18,591,498 for, 46,538,257 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed January 27, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “The PotlatchDeltic Merger-Related Compensation Proposal was not approved, as indicated below:”
Support: 29% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 81 managers: 9,777,154 for, 19,952,846 against, 11,574 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 283 managers: 4,538,227 for, 26,389,450 against, 184,213 abstained, 8,287 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 2 managers: 213,066 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 7 managers: 3,162,963 for, 165,831 against.