Home › Companies › Piedmont Lithium Inc. › 2025-2026

Piedmont Lithium Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Compiled from SEC Form N-PX filings and Piedmont Lithium Inc.’s Form 8-K, filed August 22, 2025 (Item 5.07 on EDGAR). Page generated October 25, 2026.

  • 4Reported items
  • 153Asset managers
  • 490Fund votes
  • August 22, 2025Meeting date

Results at a glance

Meeting of August 22, 2025: 3 items on Piedmont Lithium Inc.’s Form 8-K, filed August 22, 2025: 3 without a stated outcome.

Material dissent

None.

Material dissent: a director nominee under 80% of the votes cast, say-on-pay under 70%, any other item the board put forward under 80%, or a shareholder proposal with more than 50%, on the company’s own Form 8-K tally. How this is decided

Proxy season: 2023-2024 2025-2026

Explore Piedmont Lithium Inc. in the interactive database Compare manager voting policies

Official 2025-2026 meeting results reported by Piedmont Lithium Inc.

These tallies are Piedmont Lithium Inc.’s own, as disclosed to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K, filed August 22, 2025 (Item 5.07, “Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders”). They cover every share voted at the meeting, not just the funds that file Form N-PX.

Piedmont Lithium Inc. — official shareholder meeting results, meeting held August 22, 2025
Ballot itemForAgainst AbstainWithheldBroker non-votesSupport (of votes cast)Reported outcomeVoting standard
1. Merger Proposal: To consider and vote on the proposal to adopt and approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 18, 2024 (as subsequently amended on April 22, 2025 and as it may be further amended from time to time, the "merger agreement") 11,550,191268,13395,966 ---- 98%Not verified—
2. Advisory Compensation Proposal: To consider and vote on a proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that will or may become payable by the Company to its named executive officers in connection with the merger of Merger Sub with 10,019,2371,451,239443,814 ---- 87%Not verified—
3. Adjournment Proposal: To consider and vote on any proposal to postpone or adjourn the Meeting, from time to time, to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt and app 10,786,012789,712338,566 ---- 93%Not verified—

Source: Piedmont Lithium Inc., Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 22, 2025 — read the filing on EDGAR.

How asset managers voted at the Piedmont Lithium Inc. 2025-2026 meeting

Each item below shows how the 153 asset managers that disclosed a Piedmont Lithium Inc. vote in their SEC Form N-PX filings actually voted. Share totals are the shares those managers' funds voted, summed across every fund they report. These are reported items, not a count of the ballot: fund filings describe one ballot item in different words. Two descriptions are shown as one item only on evidence — the same text (or one cut short of the other), the same director nominee, or a match to the same row of Piedmont Lithium Inc.’s own Form 8-K tally — never because they merely read alike. A description that could not be joined that way is listed on its own, so one ballot item can appear more than once.

1. 1. Merger Proposal: To consider and vote on the proposal to adopt and approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated…

Outcome not verifiedEXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSReported outcome: Not verified

Combines 2 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

98% Majority: yes · of votes cast

FOR 98%
FOR: 11,550,191AGAINST: 268,133
Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 38 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: To adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 18, 2024 (as it may be further amended from time to time, the "merger agreement"), by and among Sayona Mining Limited, Shock MergeCo Inc., and Piedmont Lithium Inc.

Piedmont Lithium Inc.’s own tally for this item (“1. Merger Proposal: To consider and vote on the proposal to adopt and approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 18, 2024 (as subsequently amended on April 22, 2025 and as it may be further amended fr”): 11,550,191 for, 268,133 against, per its Form 8-K filed August 22, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 38 asset managers below reported 1,842,728 for, 2,390 against, 12,161 abstained.

FOR
FOR: 1,842,728AGAINST: 2,390ABSTAIN: 12,161
Largest asset managers voting on “To adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 18, 2024 (as it may be further amended from ti” at Piedmont Lithium Inc., 2025-2026
Asset managerForAgainst AbstainWithheldVote
Vanguard1,117,8120 00For
BlackRock334,1540 00For
Fidelity154,0180 00For
John Hancock35,9300 00For
Equitable19,5220 12,1610Mixed
QUANTITATIVE MASTER SERIES LLC31,1910 00For
SPROTT FUNDS TRUST30,1190 00For
Charles Schwab29,8670 00For
TIAA18,8970 00For
American Century14,9820 00For
Lincoln Financial14,0000 00For
Bridge Builder Trust7,4960 00For
AIG/SunAmerica4,7940 00For
Brighthouse3,9290 00For
SEI3,1000 00For
ProShares2,8190 00For
Global X2,4550 00For
Voya2,4150 00For
Jackson National02,383 00Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO2,3380 00For
Themes ETF Trust2,1280 00For
Nationwide2,0480 00For
Calvert1,7830 00For
Northern Trust1,4360 00For
T. Rowe Price9340 00For

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. See all 38 in the interactive database.

2. 3. Adjournment Proposal: To consider and vote on any proposal to postpone or adjourn the Meeting, from time to time, to…

Outcome not verifiedCORPORATE GOVERNANCEReported outcome: Not verified

Combines 2 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

93% Majority: yes · of votes cast

FOR 93%
FOR: 10,786,012AGAINST: 789,712
Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 38 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: To postpone or adjourn the Special Meeting, from time to time, to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the Special Meeting.

Piedmont Lithium Inc.’s own tally for this item (“3. Adjournment Proposal: To consider and vote on any proposal to postpone or adjourn the Meeting, from time to time, to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there”): 10,786,012 for, 789,712 against, per its Form 8-K filed August 22, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 93% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 38 asset managers below reported 1,845,360 for, 17,092 against, 12,161 abstained.

FOR
FOR: 1,845,360AGAINST: 17,092ABSTAIN: 12,161
Largest asset managers voting on “To postpone or adjourn the Special Meeting, from time to time, to a later date or dates, if necessary or appro” at Piedmont Lithium Inc., 2025-2026
Asset managerForAgainst AbstainWithheldVote
Vanguard1,117,8120 00For
BlackRock334,1540 00For
Fidelity154,0180 00For
John Hancock35,9300 00For
Equitable19,5220 12,1610Mixed
QUANTITATIVE MASTER SERIES LLC31,1910 00For
SPROTT FUNDS TRUST30,1190 00For
Charles Schwab29,8670 00For
TIAA18,8970 00For
JPMorgan17,3790 00For
American Century14,9820 00For
Lincoln Financial014,000 00Against
Bridge Builder Trust7,4960 00For
AIG/SunAmerica4,7940 00For
Brighthouse3,9290 00For
SEI3,1000 00For
ProShares2,8190 00For
Global X2,4550 00For
Voya2,4150 00For
Jackson National2,3830 00For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO2,3380 00For
Themes ETF Trust2,1280 00For
Nationwide2,0480 00For
Calvert1,7830 00For
Northern Trust1,4360 00For

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. See all 38 in the interactive database.

3. 2. Advisory Compensation Proposal: To consider and vote on a proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the…

Outcome not verifiedFund totals may overlapSECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESReported outcome: Not verified

Combines 4 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

87% Majority: yes · of votes cast

FOR 87%
FOR: 10,019,237AGAINST: 1,451,239
Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 151 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that will or may become payable by Piedmont to its named executive officers in connection with the merger contemplated by the merger agreement.

Piedmont Lithium Inc.’s own tally for this item (“2. Advisory Compensation Proposal: To consider and vote on a proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that will or may become payable by the Company to its named executive officers in conne”): 10,019,237 for, 1,451,239 against, per its Form 8-K filed August 22, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 87% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports: 37 asset managers voting on “To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that will or may become payable by Piedmont to ” at Piedmont Lithium Inc., 2025-2026
Asset managerForAgainst AbstainWithheldVote
Vanguard1,117,8120 00For
BlackRock334,1540 00For
Fidelity154,0180 00For
John Hancock35,9300 00For
Equitable31,6830 00For
QUANTITATIVE MASTER SERIES LLC31,1910 00For
SPROTT FUNDS TRUST30,1190 00For
Charles Schwab29,8670 00For
TIAA018,897 00Against
American Century014,982 00Against
Lincoln Financial14,0000 00For
Bridge Builder Trust7,4960 00For
AIG/SunAmerica4,7940 00For
Brighthouse3,9290 00For
SEI3,1000 00For
ProShares2,8190 00For
Global X2,4550 00For
Voya02,415 00Against
Jackson National2,3830 00For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO2,3380 00For
Themes ETF Trust2,1280 00For
Nationwide2,0480 00For
Calvert1,7830 00For
Northern Trust1,4360 00For
T. Rowe Price9340 00For

Fund voting reports, all 37 managers: 1,820,940 for, 36,294 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports: 129 asset managers voting on “To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that will or may become payable by Piedmont to ” at Piedmont Lithium Inc., 2025-2026
Asset managerForAgainst AbstainWithheldVote
BlackRock416,2210 00For
United Super Pty Ltd in its capacity as Trustee for the Cons313,0310 00For
State Street205,59626 00For
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC165,2580 00For
Northern Trust87,5710 00For
T. Rowe Price59,3030 00For
MELLON INVESTMENTS Corp54,8650 00For
Point7239,2850 00For
Vanguard38,3700 00For
John Hancock37,9890 00For
Charles Schwab29,8670 00For
PARAMETRIC PORTFOLIO ASSOCIATES LLC24,1680 00For
Nuveen021,846 00Against
RBC Dominion Securities Inc.17,8750 00For
Fidelity15,9420 00For
Goldman Sachs15,9290 00For
American Century014,982 00Against
AllianceBernstein14,5380 00For
Citadel13,4950 00For
Global X11,5210 00For
BANK OF AMERICA NA9,3420 00For
STIFEL NICOLAUS & CO INC \MO\8,1710 00For
Callan Family Office, LLC7,5040 00For
Invesco6,6880 00For
Dimensional6,6060 00For

Institutional-manager reports, all 129 managers: 1,667,948 for, 50,590 against, 371 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

4. Advisory Vote on Golden Parachutes

No official matchSECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES

0.9% of fund votes cast · no official result

AGAINST
Details: votes by 2 asset managers

The 2 asset managers below reported 154 for, 17,379 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

FOR: 154AGAINST: 17,379
Largest asset managers voting on “Advisory Vote on Golden Parachutes” at Piedmont Lithium Inc., 2025-2026
Asset managerForAgainst AbstainWithheldVote
JPMorgan017,379 00Against
TD Waterhouse Canada Inc.1540 00For

Largest Piedmont Lithium Inc. shareholders voting in 2025-2026

Ranked separately for each type of Form N-PX report. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two tables can list the same shares and are never added together. Each is ranked by the shares voted on the item that the most managers of that type reported.

Fund voting reports: top Piedmont Lithium Inc. shareholders by shares voted on “To postpone or adjourn the Special Meeting, from time to time, to a later date or dates, if…”, 2025-2026
#Asset manager Shares voted
1Vanguard 1,117,812
2BlackRock 334,154
3Fidelity 154,018
4John Hancock 35,930
5Equitable 31,683
6QUANTITATIVE MASTER SERIES LLC 31,191
7SPROTT FUNDS TRUST 30,119
8Charles Schwab 29,867
9TIAA 18,897
10JPMorgan 17,379
Institutional-manager reports: top Piedmont Lithium Inc. shareholders by shares voted on “To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that will or may become payable…”, 2025-2026
#Asset manager Shares voted
1BlackRock 416,221
2United Super Pty Ltd in its capacity as Trustee for the Cons 313,031
3State Street 205,622
4GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC 165,258
5Northern Trust 87,571
6T. Rowe Price 59,303
7MELLON INVESTMENTS Corp 54,865
8Point72 39,285
9Vanguard 38,370
10John Hancock 37,989

Shown as share counts, not percentages: no shares-outstanding figure has been matched to Piedmont Lithium Inc. for the 2025-2026 season, so there is no denominator to divide by.

About this page

Every figure above is derived from filings made with the US Securities and Exchange Commission: Form N-PX, in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes), and Form 8-K Item 5.07, in which the company reports its own meeting results. This page is a static snapshot rebuilt weekly on October 25, 2026; a live search always shows the current data.

At Piedmont Lithium Inc.'s shareholder meeting held August 22, 2025, in the 2025-2026 proxy season, 153 asset managers reported how they voted in their SEC Form N-PX filings, covering 490 separate fund positions. Their filings are grouped here into 4 reported items; because filers word the same ballot item differently, that can be more than the number of items on the ballot. On the most widely held item on that ballot — To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that will or may become payable… — FOR was 87% of the votes cast (FOR divided by FOR plus AGAINST, the conventional basis for proxy support; abstentions, broker non-votes and unvoted shares are excluded because none of them took a side), which is more than half. Whether the item was approved is for the filing to say; that statement has not been read for this item. Source: Piedmont Lithium Inc.'s Form 8-K, Item 5.07, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on August 22, 2025.

Piedmont Lithium Inc. proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2025-2026 (this page).

Download data (CSV): ballot items · votes by manager · column guide.