Peakstone Realty Trust 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To approve the merger of Neon REIT Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("REIT Merger Sub") and a subsidiary of BSREP V Neon Pooling REIT L.P., BSREP V Neon Pooling Non-REIT L.P. and BSREP V Brookfield Neon Sub L.P., each a Delaware limited partnership (collectively, "Parent"), with and into Peakstone Realty Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the "Company" and such merger, the "Company Merger"), pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 2, 2026 (as may be amended from time to time, the "Merger Agreement"), by and among the Company, PKST OP, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and a subsidiary of the Company (the "Operating Partnership"), Parent, REIT Merger Sub and Neon OP Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a subsidiary of Parent, and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the "Merger Proposal");

Peakstone Realty Trust’s own tally for this item (“1. Proposal to approve the Company Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the " Merger Proposal ")”): 21,848,801 for, 304,887 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed April 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 – The proposal to approve the Company Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the " Merger Proposal ") was approved as follows:”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 49 asset managers below reported 7,823,842 for, 18,980 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 49 asset managers. See all 49 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve any adjournments of the special meeting of the shareholders of the Company (the "Special Meeting") for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Proposal.

Peakstone Realty Trust’s own tally for this item (“3. Proposal to approve any adjournment of the Special Meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies if there were not sufficient votes at the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Proposal”): 20,966,414 for, 1,127,090 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed April 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 3 – The proposal to approve any adjournment of the Special Meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies if there were not sufficient votes at the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Proposal was approved as follows:”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 50 asset managers below reported 7,783,268 for, 43,394 against, 18,980 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the named executive officers of the Company that is based on or otherwise relates to the Company Merger and the Partnership Merger (as defined in the accompanying proxy statement); and

Peakstone Realty Trust’s own tally for this item (“2. Proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the Company's named executive officers in connection with the Mergers”): 16,360,800 for, 5,655,446 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed April 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2 – The proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the Company's named executive officers in connection with the Mergers was approved as follows:”
Support: 74% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 49 managers: 7,506,105 for, 336,718 against, 1 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 176 managers: 6,435,395 for, 4,622,036 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.