NECESSITY RETAIL REIT INC. 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To approve the merger of RTL and GNL, which will be effected through a merger of RTL with and into Osmosis Sub I, LLC ("REIT Merger Sub"), a wholly owned subsidiary of GNL.

NECESSITY RETAIL REIT INC.’s own tally for this item (“1. RTL Merger Proposal”): 73,143,092 for, 15,468,795 against, per its Form 8-K filed September 8, 2023 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 83% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 55 asset managers below reported 35,933,909 for, 5,479,765 against, 128,090 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 55 asset managers. See all 55 in the interactive database.

The 2 asset managers below reported 91,596 for, 11,642 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To approve the adjournment of the RTL Special Meeting one or more times if necessary or appropriate to permit, among other things, further solicitation of proxies in favor of the RTL Merger Proposal (the "RTL Adjournment Proposal").

The 44 asset managers below reported 32,075,205 for, 8,625,320 against, 128,090 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 44 asset managers. See all 44 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve the adjournment of RTL Special Meeting one or more times if necessary or appropriate to permit, among other things, further solicitation of proxies in favor of the RTL Merger Proposal ( the " RTL Adjournment Proposal")

The 9 asset managers below reported 648,177 for, 30,064 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 2 asset managers below reported 91,596 for, 11,642 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, by advisory (non- binding) vote, certain compensation arrangements for RTL's named executive officers in connection with the Proposed Transactions discussed under the section titled "The Companies - The Combined Company - Potential Conflicts of Interest of Officers and Directors of GNL and RTL" beginning on page 50.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 43 managers: 33,615,151 for, 7,213,128 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 118 managers: 19,605,052 for, 10,165,545 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, by advisory (non-binding) vote, certain compensation arrangements for RTL's named executives officers in connection with the Proposed Transactions discussed under the section titled " The Companies- The Combined Company- Potential Conflicts of Interest of Officers and Directors of GNL and RTL"

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 9 managers: 596,047 for, 82,194 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 33 managers: 496,600 for, 592,961 against, 2,240 withheld, 81,137 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 3 managers: 103,238 for, 118,409 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 3 managers: 403,419 for.

Description as filed by funds: TO APPROVE, BY ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE, CERTAIN COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR RTL'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS DISCUSSED UNDER THE SECTION TITLED THE COMPANIES - THE COMBINED COMPANY - POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OF GNL AND RTL" BEGINNING ON PAGE 50. "

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 1 managers: 336 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 3 managers: 9,456 against.

The 2 asset managers below reported 2,000 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, by advisory (non-binding) vote, certain compensation arrangements for the RTL's named executive officers in connection with the Proposed Transactions discussed under the section titled "The Companies - The Combine Company - Potential Conflicts of Intrest of Officers and Directors of GNL and RTL" beginning on page 50.

The 2 asset managers below reported 10,358 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.