Middlefield Banc Corp. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: A proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 22, 2025 (as it may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time, the "Merger Agreement"), by and between Farmers National Banc Corp. ("Farmers") and Middlefield providing for the merger of Middlefield with and into Farmers, with Farmers as the surviving entity (the "Merger"), as more fully described in the joint proxy statement/prospectus.

Middlefield Banc Corp.’s own tally for this item (“1. Merger Proposal”): 6,327,107 for, 366,618 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed February 10, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The results of the shareholder vote on each of the three proposals were as follows: Proposal 1 - Merger Proposal The Company's shareholders approved the proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 22, 2025, by and between Farmers and the Company, providing for the merger…”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 39 managers: 946,119 for, 20,775 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 11,700 for.

Description as filed by funds: A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE ADJOURNMENT OF THE MIDDLEFIELD SPECIAL MEETING, IF NECESSARY, TO PERMIT FURTHER SOLICITATION OF PROXIES IF THERE ARE NOT SUFFICIENT VOTES AT THE TIME OF THE MIDDLEFIELD SPECIAL MEETING TO ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT.

Middlefield Banc Corp.’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 3: approved, the adjournment of the special meeting was not necessary because the Company's shareholders approved Proposal 1. The following is a tabulation of the voting results for Proposal 3:”): 6,212,799 for, 511,020 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed February 10, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 3 - Adjournment Proposal The Company's shareholders approved a proposal to adjourn the special meeting if adjournment is necessary to allow solicitation of additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the Merger Agreement.”
Support: 92% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 39 asset managers below reported 939,553 for, 27,341 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 39 asset managers. See all 39 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE, ON AN ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) BASIS, THE MERGER-RELATED CONSIDERATION TO BE RECEIVED BY THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF MIDDLEFIELD IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGER.

Middlefield Banc Corp.’s own tally for this item (“2. Merger-Related Compensation Proposal”): 5,822,230 for, 863,747 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed February 10, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2 - Merger-Related Compensation Proposal The Company's shareholders approved a proposal to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the merger-related consideration to be received by the named executive officers of Middlefield Banc Corp. in connection with the merger.”
Support: 87% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 39 managers: 931,913 for, 34,981 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 88 managers: 838,408 for, 139,038 against, 2,499 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.