MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP. 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To pass, with or without variation, a special resolution, the full text of which is set forth in Annex B to the accompanying proxy statement (the "Proxy Statement"), approving a statutory arrangement (the "Arrangement") under Division 5 of Part 9 of the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) involving Masonite International Corporation, as more particularly described in the Proxy Statement (the "Arrangement Resolution");

MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP.’s own tally for this item (“1. The proposal to adopt a special resolution approving the Arrangement and the related proposals described in Annex B to the Proxy Statement (the " Arrangement Resolution Proposal ")”): 16,366,246 for, 13,319 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed April 25, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The proposals were approved by the requisite vote of Masonite's shareholders.”
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a supermajority of the shares outstanding (“74.65% of the shares entitled to vote”).

The 81 asset managers below reported 8,042,824 for, 4,085 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 81 asset managers. See all 81 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approve Merger Agreement

MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP.’s own tally for this item (“2. The proposal to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Masonite's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise related to the Arrangement Agreemen”): 15,831,770 for, 499,147 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 25, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 2 asset managers below reported 543,459 for.

Description as filed by funds: To consider and vote on any proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the Arrangement at the time of the Special Meeting (the "Adjournment Proposal").

MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP.’s own tally for this item (“3. The proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the Arrangement Agreement at the time of the Special Meeting (the " Adjo”): 15,802,336 for, 567,649 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 25, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 82 asset managers below reported 8,499,272 for, 87,011 against, 4,085 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 82 asset managers. See all 82 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve on an advisory (non-binding) basis the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Masonite's named executive officers in connection with the Arrangement (the "Compensation Proposal"); and

MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP.’s own tally for this item (“2. The proposal to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Masonite's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise related to the Arrangement Agreemen”): 15,831,770 for, 499,147 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 25, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund share totals are not shown for this item: fund-reported shares overlap across filings (an adviser and the funds it manages can each report the same shares), and here their sum exceeds the total votes cast at the meeting.

Showing the 25 largest of 255 asset managers. See all 255 in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 3 managers: 543,502 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 4 managers: 24,675 for, 60,939 against.