LITHIUM AMERICAS CORP. 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

The 25 asset managers below reported 2,831,490,921 for, 87,052 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 25 asset managers below reported 2,832,379,886 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 25 asset managers below reported 2,831,493,324 for, 79,119 against, 7,530 withheld. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 25 asset managers below reported 2,831,490,921 for, 87,052 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 25 asset managers below reported 2,831,500,941 for, 79,032 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 25 asset managers below reported 2,831,577,973 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 25 asset managers below reported 2,831,490,921 for, 87,052 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 25 asset managers below reported 1,492,221 for, 483,691 against, 2,829,600,325 withheld, 3,736 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 15 asset managers below reported 1,942,385 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 15 asset managers below reported 1,942,385 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 15 asset managers below reported 1,942,385 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 15 asset managers below reported 1,938,701 for, 3,684 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 15 asset managers below reported 1,942,385 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 15 asset managers below reported 1,942,385 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 15 asset managers below reported 1,942,385 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 12 asset managers below reported 765,528 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 16 asset managers below reported 2,830,699,506 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ARRANGEMENT RESOLUTION, TO CONSIDER AND, IF THOUGHT FIT, APPROVE, WITH OR WITHOUT VARIATION, AN ORDINARY RESOLUTION, THE FULL TEXT OF WHICH IS SET FORTH IN THE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR, TO APPROVE AN EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN FOR NEW LAC (AS DEFINED IN MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR), AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR

The 8 asset managers below reported 82,891 for, 14,495 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: TO CONSIDER AND, IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE, TO PASS, WITH OR WITHOUT VARIATION, A SPECIAL RESOLUTION, THE FULL TEXT OF WHICH IS SET FORTH IN THE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR, FOR THE ARRANGEMENT (AS DEFINED IN THE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR)

The 7 asset managers below reported 96,686 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To consider and, if deemed appropriate, to approve, with or without variation, a special resolution, substantially in the form set out in the management information circular dated March 21, 2024 under the heading "Items of Business - Amendment to the Company's Articles - The Articles Amendment - The Articles Amendment Resolution" approving the Articles Amendment (as defined and described in the management information circular dated March 21, 2024) altering the authorized share structure of the Corporation by creating two new classes of preferred shares, each issuable in one or more series, and amending the special rights and restrictions to the common shares of the Corporation.

The 5 asset managers below reported 132,480 for, 4,184 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 16 asset managers below reported 2,831,528,744 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 756,257 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 7 asset managers below reported 96,686 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 5 asset managers below reported 136,664 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 4 asset managers below reported 939,180 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 125 for, 756,132 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: TO CONSIDER AND, IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE, TO PASS, WITH OR WITHOUT VARIATION, AN ORDINARY RESOLUTION, THE FULL TEXT OF WHICH IS SET FORTH IN THE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR, TO APPROVE, IN CONNECTION WITH THE GM TRANSACTION (AS DEFINED IN THE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR), THE OWNERSHIP BY GENERAL MOTORS HOLDINGS LLC AND ITS AFFILIATES OF MORE THAN 20% OF THE ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING COMMON SHARES OF THE COMPANY (OR FOLLOWING THE ARRANGEMENT, NEW LAC), ALL AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR

The 7 asset managers below reported 96,686 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 4 asset managers below reported 939,180 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 16 asset managers below reported 2,858,219,508 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 16 asset managers below reported 2,858,219,508 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 16 asset managers below reported 2,829,810,769 for, 933,739 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 4 asset managers below reported 939,180 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 6 managers: 96,560 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 101 managers: 4,537,165 for, 459 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

The 17 asset managers below reported 2,830,744,508 for, 41,448 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 4 managers: 939,180 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 329,296 for.

The 16 asset managers below reported 2,831,040,712 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 756,257 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE ENSUING YEAR AND AUTHORIZING THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY TO FIX THEIR REMUNERATION

The 7 asset managers below reported 88,666 for, 8,020 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants as Auditors of the Corporation for the ensuing year and authorizing the Directors to fix their remuneration.

The 5 asset managers below reported 136,664 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 4 asset managers below reported 939,180 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.