Guess?, Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger (as it may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time, the "Merger Agreement"), dated as of August 20, 2025, by and among Guess?, Inc. ("Guess"), Authentic Brands Group LLC, Glow HoldCo 1, Inc. ("Parent") and Glow Merger Sub 1, Inc. ("Merger Sub") and approve the merger of Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, with and into Guess (the "Merger"), and a resolution approving the Disposition (as defined in the Proxy Statement) (the "Merger Proposal").

Guess?, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Statutory Merger Approval”): 41,501,758 for, 484,707 against, per its Form 8-K filed November 25, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 45 asset managers below reported 8,025,572 for, 30,733 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 45 asset managers. See all 45 in the interactive database.

The 2 asset managers below reported 27,882 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To adjourn the Special Meeting of Stockholders, from time to time, to a later date or dates, if deemed by the Special Committee, composed solely of independent and disinterested directors and formed by the Guess Board of Directors, to be necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to approve the Merger Proposal.

The 45 asset managers below reported 7,566,442 for, 488,905 against, 1,070 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 45 asset managers. See all 45 in the interactive database.

The 2 asset managers below reported 27,882 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that will or may become payable by Guess to its named executive officers in connection with the Merger.

Guess?, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“2. Compensation Proposal: At the Special Meeting, the Company's stockholders voted upon a proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that will or may become payable by the Company to its name”): 30,282,011 for, 11,685,202 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed November 25, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “2 At the Special Meeting, the Company's stockholders approved, on a non-binding advisory basis, the Compensation Proposal as follows:”
Support: 72% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the shares present or represented (“majority of shares of the Company Common Stock present”).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 1,996,670 for, 6,058,677 against, 1,070 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 144 managers: 439,332 for, 5,220,280 against, 54,600 abstained, 1,517 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 2 managers: 27,882 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 3 managers: 50 for, 800 against, 16,590 abstained.