Golden Entertainment, Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To consider and vote on the proposal to adopt that certain Master Transaction Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2025, (as it has been or may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time, the "Master Transaction Agreement"), by and among Golden, Argento, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company ("OpCo Buyer"), VICI Properties Inc., a Maryland corporation ("VICI" or "PropCo Buyer") and VICI ROYAL MERGER SUB LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of PropCo Buyer ("PropCo Merger Sub") and the transactions contemplated thereby or therein (the "Transaction Proposal");

Golden Entertainment, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“1. To adopt the MTA and the transactions contemplated thereby or therein”): 20,430,245 for, 208,131 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed April 1, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The foregoing Proposal 1 was approved by the requisite vote of the Company's shareholders.”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 58 asset managers below reported 5,852,482 for, 12,620 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 58 asset managers. See all 58 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To consider and vote on the proposal to adopt that certain Master Transaction Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2025, (as it has been or may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time, the "Master Transaction Agreement"), by and among Golden, Argento, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company ("OpCo Buyer"), VICI Properties Inc., a Maryland corporation ("VICI" or "PropCo Buyer") and VICI ROYAL MERGER SUB LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of PropCo Buyer ("PropCo Merger Sub")

The 3 asset managers below reported 386,931 for, 1 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 2 asset managers below reported 19,215 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To consider and vote on a proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting, from time to time, to a later date or dates to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the Transaction Proposal at the time of the Special Meeting (the "Adjournment Proposal").

Golden Entertainment, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“3. To approve one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting, from time to time, to a later date or dates to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt Proposal 1 at the time of the Special Meet”): 19,538,974 for, 1,096,295 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed April 1, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The foregoing Proposal 3 was approved by the requisite vote of the Company's shareholders.”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 60 asset managers below reported 5,916,912 for, 319,811 against, 15,310 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 60 asset managers. See all 60 in the interactive database.

The 2 asset managers below reported 19,215 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To consider and vote on the proposal to approve, on a non binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable by Golden to its named executive officers in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Master Transaction Agreement (the "Advisory Compensation Proposal"); and

Golden Entertainment, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“2. To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable by the Company to its named executive officers in connection with the transactions contemplated by the MTA”): 18,321,781 for, 2,330,138 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed April 1, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The foregoing Proposal 2 was approved by the requisite vote of the Company's shareholders.”
Support: 89% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 57 managers: 5,602,158 for, 647,187 against, 2,690 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 160 managers: 6,564,058 for, 1,710,874 against, 200 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 2 managers: 19,215 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 7,857 for, 1,285 against.