First Foundation Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: First Foundation Merger Proposal. To consider and vote on a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 27, 2025, by and between FirstSun Capital Bancorp, which we refer to as FirstSun, and First Foundation, as it may be amended from time to time, which we refer to as the merger agreement, a copy of which is included as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus of which this notice is a part, under which First Foundation will merge with and into FirstSun, and to approve the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby (the "First Foundation merger proposal");

First Foundation Inc.’s own tally for this item (“1. First Foundation merger proposal”): 63,026,154 for, 36,785 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed February 27, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Each proposal considered and voted on was approved by the requisite vote of First Foundation's stockholders.”
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 48 asset managers below reported 14,258,977 for.

Showing the 25 largest of 48 asset managers. See all 48 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: First Foundation Amendment Proposal. To consider and vote on a proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, an amendment to FirstSun's certificate of incorporation to (1) increase the number of authorized shares of FirstSun's common stock and (2) to create a class of FirstSun non-voting common stock (the "First Foundation amendment proposal").

First Foundation Inc.’s own tally for this item (“4. A proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, an amendment to FirstSun's certificate of incorporation to (1) increase the number of authorized shares of FirstSun's common stock and (2) to create a class of ”): 62,964,438 for, 94,736 against, per its Form 8-K filed February 27, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 49 asset managers below reported 14,363,488 for.

Showing the 25 largest of 49 asset managers. See all 49 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: First Foundation Adjournment Proposal. To consider and vote on a proposal to adjourn the First Foundation special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to permit further solicitation of proxies in favor of the First Foundation merger (the "First Foundation adjournment proposal"); and

The 40 asset managers below reported 13,525,957 for, 84,843 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 40 asset managers. See all 40 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: TO APPROVE THE ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETING, IF NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE, TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES TO APPROVE THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THE MERGER AGREEMENT.

The 8 asset managers below reported 647,926 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: First Foundation Merger Compensation Proposal. To consider and vote on proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the named executive officers of First Foundation that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger (the "First Foundation merger compensation proposal");

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 40 managers: 13,231,508 for, 379,292 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 91 managers: 22,079,791 for, 441,394 against, 59,554 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to First Foundation's named executive officers in connection with the merger.

First Foundation Inc.’s own tally for this item (“2. A proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the named executive officers of First Foundation that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger (the”): 61,420,708 for, 1,570,317 against, per its Form 8-K filed February 27, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 8 managers: 645,592 for, 2,334 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 33 managers: 14,055,880 for, 20,689 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.