Duke Energy Corporation 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Derrick Burks

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Derrick Burks”): 519,072,978 for, 6,335,896 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 222,088,442 for, 109 against, 58,596 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Annette K. Clayton

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Annette K. Clayton”): 519,917,387 for, 5,631,105 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 222,084,083 for, 4,470 against, 58,595 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Theodore F. Craver, Jr.

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Theodore F. Craver, Jr.”): 467,063,319 for, 57,570,091 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 89% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 220,596,709 for, 1,491,828 against, 58,612 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Robert M. Davis

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Robert M. Davis”): 510,791,969 for, 14,539,322 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 222,056,286 for, 32,266 against, 58,598 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Caroline Dorsa

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Caroline Dorsa”): 515,516,034 for, 9,974,497 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 221,491,228 for, 597,326 against, 58,596 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: W. Roy Dunbar

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: W. Roy Dunbar”): 515,993,581 for, 9,423,852 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 222,082,799 for, 4,474 against, 58,596 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Nicholas C. Fanandakis

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Nicholas C. Fanandakis”): 515,070,499 for, 9,532,708 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 222,088,407 for, 131 against, 58,612 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Jeffrey B. Guldner

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Jeffrey B. Guldner”): 520,300,390 for, 5,087,962 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 99.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 222,088,459 for, 90 against, 58,598 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: John T. Herron

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: John T. Herron”): 518,085,417 for, 7,359,747 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 222,078,347 for, 8,928 against, 58,596 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Idalene F. Kesner

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Idalene F. Kesner”): 514,591,964 for, 10,912,897 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 222,057,312 for, 31,240 against, 58,595 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Michael J. Pacilio

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Michael J. Pacilio”): 516,941,148 for, 8,453,855 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 222,088,451 for, 98 against, 58,598 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Harry K. Sideris

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Harry K. Sideris”): 521,709,419 for, 3,583,689 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 99.3% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 222,088,489 for, 63 against, 58,599 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Thomas E. Skains

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Thomas E. Skains”): 500,852,867 for, 23,734,150 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 220,743,869 for, 1,344,259 against, 59,021 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: William E. Webster, Jr.

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: William E. Webster, Jr.”): 507,680,482 for, 17,711,679 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Director Nominees Each director nominee was elected to the Board of Directors with the support of a majority of the votes cast.”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 217 asset managers below reported 220,744,015 for, 1,344,129 against, 59,006 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 217 asset managers. See all 217 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Duke Energy Corporation to eliminate supermajority requirements

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“4. Management proposal regarding an amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Duke Energy Corporation to eliminate supermajority voting requirements”): 516,664,589 for, 7,507,137 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). This item required more than a simple majority of votes cast — see the filing.

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 4: Management proposal regarding an amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Duke Energy Corporation to eliminate supermajority voting requirements”
Not approved: the filing states that this item needed more than a majority of the votes cast.
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 222 asset managers below reported 222,141,265 for, 9,389 against, 48 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 222 asset managers. See all 222 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Advisory vote to approve Duke Energy's named executive officer compensation

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“3. Advisory vote to approve the Company's named executive officer compensation”): 496,884,668 for, 26,030,663 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the shares present or represented (“majority of the shares represented”).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 207 managers: 221,949,298 for, 144,534 against, 58,636 abstained, 600 not voted, 127 mixed. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1,201 managers: 283,036,072 for, 12,906,698 against, 170,277 abstained, 77,876 not voted, 80,909 mixed. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Duke Energy's independent registered public accounting firm for 2026

Duke Energy Corporation’s own tally for this item (“2. Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2026”): 639,757,086 for, 28,434,117 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 13, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the shares present or represented (“majority of the shares represented”).

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Duke Energy Corporation’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Ratify Appointment of Independent Auditors” (7 managers, Fund and manager reports combined; may count the same shares twice; no share total shown).

The 215 asset managers below reported 220,474,199 for, 1,561,320 against, 58,589 abstained, 590 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.