DEUTSCHE POST AG 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 86 managers: 122,069,980 for, 89,664 against, 32,842 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,710,634 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 86 managers: 122,069,980 for, 89,664 against, 32,842 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,710,634 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 86 managers: 122,069,980 for, 89,664 against, 32,842 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,710,634 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 85 managers: 122,159,247 for, 32,842 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,710,634 for.

The 20 asset managers below reported 6,361,152 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 20 asset managers below reported 6,361,152 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 20 asset managers below reported 6,361,152 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of the actions of the members of the Board of Management (This vote or instruction also applies where voting is carried out on an individual basis).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 1 managers: 36 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 85 for.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of the actions of the members of the Supervisory Board (This vote or instruction also applies where voting is carried out on an individual basis).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 1 managers: 36 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 85 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 1 managers: 36 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 85 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 1 managers: 36 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 85 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 1 managers: 36 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 85 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 86 managers: 122,159,644 for, 32,842 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,710,634 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 86 managers: 122,159,644 for, 32,842 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,710,634 for.

The 20 asset managers below reported 6,361,152 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 20 asset managers below reported 6,361,152 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 20 asset managers below reported 6,361,152 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Appropriation of available net retained profit (This vote or instruction also applies to an adjusted appropriation proposal resulting from a change to the number of shares entitled to dividends).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 1 managers: 36 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 85 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 7 managers: 373,819 for, 483,035 abstained, 755,038 not voted.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,710,634 for.

The 3 asset managers below reported 373,819 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: APR 2024: PLEASE NOTE THAT IF YOU HOLD CREST DEPOSITORY INTERESTS (CDIS) AND PARTICIPATE AT THIS MEETING, YOU (OR YOUR CREST SPONSORED MEMBER/CUSTODIAN) WILL BE REQUIRED TO INSTRUCT A TRANSFER OF THE RELEVANT CDIS TO THE ESCROW ACCOUNT SPECIFIED IN THE ASSOCIATED CORPORATE EVENT IN THE CREST SYSTEM. THIS TRANSFER WILL NEED TO BE COMPLETED BY THE SPECIFIED CREST SYSTEM DEADLINE. ONCE THIS TRANSFER HAS SETTLED, THE CDIS WILL BE BLOCKED IN THE CREST SYSTEM. THE CDIS WILL TYPICALLY BE RELEASED FROM ESCROW AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE ON RECORD DATE +1 DAY (OR ON MEETING DATE +1 DAY IF NO RECORD DATE APPLIES) UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, AND ONLY AFTER THE AGENT HAS CONFIRMED AVAILABILITY OF THE POSITION. IN ORDER FOR A VOTE TO BE ACCEPTED, THE VOTED POSITION MUST BE BLOCKED IN THE REQUIRED ESCROW ACCOUNT IN THE CREST SYSTEM. BY VOTING ON THIS MEETING, YOUR CREST SPONSORED MEMBER/CUSTODIAN MAY USE YOUR VOTE INSTRUCTION AS THE AUTHORIZATION TO TAKE THE NECESSARY ACTION WHICH WILL INCLUDE TRANSFERRING YOUR INSTRUCTED POSITION TO ESCROW. PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CREST SPONSORED MEMBER/CUSTODIAN DIRECTLY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE CUSTODY PROCESS AND WHETHER OR NOT THEY REQUIRE SEPARATE INSTRUCTIONS FROM YOU

The 3 asset managers below reported 373,819 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: APR 2024: PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A REVISION DUE TO ADDITION OF COMMENTS. IF YOU HAVE ALREADY SENT IN YOUR VOTES, PLEASE DO NOT VOTE AGAIN UNLESS YOU DECIDE TO AMEND YOUR ORIGINAL INSTRUCTIONS. THANK YOU

The 3 asset managers below reported 373,819 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: ACCORDING TO GERMAN LAW, IN CASE OF SPECIFIC CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN CONNECTION WITH SPECIFIC ITEMS OF THE AGENDA FOR THE GENERAL MEETING YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO EXERCISE YOUR VOTING RIGHTS. FURTHER, YOUR VOTING RIGHT MIGHT BE EXCLUDED WHEN YOUR SHARE IN VOTING RIGHTS HAS REACHED CERTAIN THRESHOLDS AND YOU HAVE NOT COMPLIED WITH ANY OF YOUR MANDATORY VOTING RIGHTS NOTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE GERMAN SECURITIES TRADING ACT (WPHG). FOR QUESTIONS IN THIS REGARD PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLIENT SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE FOR CLARIFICATION. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE ANY INDICATION REGARDING SUCH CONFLICT OF INTEREST, OR ANOTHER EXCLUSION FROM VOTING, PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR VOTE AS USUAL

The 3 asset managers below reported 373,819 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: FROM 10TH FEBRUARY, BROADRIDGE WILL CODE ALL AGENDAS FOR GERMAN MEETINGS IN ENGLISH ONLY. IF YOU WISH TO SEE THE AGENDA IN GERMAN, THIS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE AS A LINK UNDER THE 'MATERIAL URL' DROPDOWN AT THE TOP OF THE BALLOT. THE GERMAN AGENDAS FOR ANY EXISTING OR PAST MEETINGS WILL REMAIN IN PLACE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLIENT SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE.

The 3 asset managers below reported 373,819 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: FURTHER INFORMATION ON COUNTER PROPOSALS CAN BE FOUND DIRECTLY ON THE ISSUER'S WEBSITE (PLEASE REFER TO THE MATERIAL URL SECTION OF THE APPLICATION). IF YOU WISH TO ACT ON THESE ITEMS, YOU WILL NEED TO REQUEST A MEETING ATTEND AND VOTE YOUR SHARES DIRECTLY AT THE COMPANY'S MEETING. COUNTER PROPOSALS CANNOT BE REFLECTED IN THE BALLOT ON PROXYEDGE

The 3 asset managers below reported 373,819 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: PLEASE NOTE THAT FOLLOWING THE AMENDMENT TO PARAGRAPH 21 OF THE SECURITIES TRADE ACT ON 9TH JULY 2015 AND THE OVER-RULING OF THE DISTRICT COURT IN COLOGNE JUDGMENT FROM 6TH JUNE 2012 THE VOTING PROCESS HAS NOW CHANGED WITH REGARD TO THE GERMAN REGISTERED SHARES. AS A RESULT, IT IS NOW THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE END-INVESTOR (I.E. FINAL BENEFICIARY) AND NOT THE INTERMEDIARY TO DISCLOSE RESPECTIVE FINAL BENEFICIARY VOTING RIGHTS THEREFORE THE CUSTODIAN BANK / AGENT IN THE MARKET WILL BE SENDING THE VOTING DIRECTLY TO MARKET AND IT IS THE END INVESTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THE REGISTRATION ELEMENT IS COMPLETE WITH THE ISSUER DIRECTLY, SHOULD THEY HOLD MORE THAN 3 % OF THE TOTAL SHARE CAPITAL

The 3 asset managers below reported 373,819 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: THE VOTE/REGISTRATION DEADLINE AS DISPLAYED ON PROXYEDGE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND WILL BE UPDATED AS SOON AS BROADRIDGE RECEIVES CONFIRMATION FROM THE SUB CUSTODIANS REGARDING THEIR INSTRUCTION DEADLINE. FOR ANY QUERIES PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLIENT SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE

The 3 asset managers below reported 373,819 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: VOTING MUST BE LODGED WITH SHAREHOLDER DETAILS AS PROVIDED BY YOUR CUSTODIAN. IF NO SHAREHOLDER DETAILS ARE PROVIDED, YOUR INSTRUCTION MAY BE REJECTED

The 3 asset managers below reported 373,819 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 86 managers: 121,688,418 for, 471,226 against, 32,842 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 20 managers: 15,877,037 for, 5,346 against, 49,024 not voted.

The 37 asset managers below reported 932,952 for, 3,861 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 37 asset managers. See all 37 in the interactive database.

The 20 asset managers below reported 6,361,152 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 2 asset managers below reported 290,591 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 71 managers: 115,058,570 for, 32,842 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,710,634 for.

The 20 asset managers below reported 6,361,152 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: RATIFY DELOITTE GMBH AS AUDITORS AND AUDITOR OF SUSTAINABILITY REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 AND FOR THE REVIEW OF INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2025

The 16 asset managers below reported 7,093,172 for, 7,902 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 1 managers: 36 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 85 for.