Cushman & Wakefield plc 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Election of the three director nominees named in the Proxy Statement to a one-year term expiring at the 2027 annual general meeting: Jodie Mclean

Cushman & Wakefield plc’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Jodie McLean”): 202,181,285 for, 6,450,424 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 111,212,359 for, 19,390 against, 22,990 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of the three director nominees named in the Proxy Statement to a one-year term expiring at the 2027 annual general meeting: Timothy Wennes

Cushman & Wakefield plc’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Timothy Wennes”): 208,444,766 for, 186,493 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 111,231,749 for, 22,990 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of the three director nominees named in the Proxy Statement to a one-year term expiring at the 2027 annual general meeting: Billie Williamson

Cushman & Wakefield plc’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Billie Williamson”): 208,316,314 for, 315,390 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 111,231,749 for, 22,990 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve Scheme Resolution No. 4, a proposal to approve the issue of the New Shares to New Cushman & Wakefield as part of the Scheme such that Cushman & Wakefield will become a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of New Cushman & Wakefield.

The 63 asset managers below reported 86,521,148 for, 2,013,327 against, 9,490 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 63 asset managers. See all 63 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve Scheme Resolution No. 1, a proposal to approve the Scheme and give the Board the authority to carry out the procedural actions necessary to implement the Scheme.

The 61 asset managers below reported 86,057,892 for, 2,030,132 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 61 asset managers. See all 61 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve Scheme Resolution No. 2, a proposal to authorize the reduction of the Company's share capital associated with the cancellation and extinguishment of the Scheme Shares.

The 61 asset managers below reported 86,074,697 for, 2,013,327 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 61 asset managers. See all 61 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve Scheme Resolution No. 3, a proposal to amend the Articles to ensure that any additional Cushman & Wakefield Shares issued pursuant to the Cushman & Wakefield Equity Incentive Plans, or otherwise, are, dependent on timing, subject to the Scheme or exchanged for New Cushman & Wakefield Shares, and create a new class of B ordinary shares.

The 61 asset managers below reported 86,074,697 for, 2,013,327 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 61 asset managers. See all 61 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve the Court Meeting Resolution, a resolution to approve the Scheme as set forth in the Document.

Cushman & Wakefield plc’s own tally for this item (“1. Approval of the Scheme”): 196,455,939 for, 5,745,962 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed October 16, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “At the Meetings, Cushman & Wakefield Shareholders approved, among other matters, the scheme of arrangement (the "Scheme") to effect Cushman & Wakefield's Redomiciliation and the issuance of common shares (the "New Cushman & Wakefield Shares") of Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 61 asset managers below reported 86,555,801 for, 1,534,450 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 61 asset managers. See all 61 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve Advisory Resolution No. 3, Bye-law Provision: Authorization of Preference Shares, a proposal seeking our Shareholders' views, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on the authorization of preference shares in the New Cushman & Wakefield Bye-laws.

Cushman & Wakefield plc’s own tally for this item (“Bye-law Preference Shares Proposal”): 191,688,208 for, 8,185,855 against, per its Form 8-K filed October 16, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 63 asset managers below reported 85,214,637 for, 3,329,328 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 63 asset managers. See all 63 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve Advisory Resolution No. 1, Bye-law Provision: Board Declassification, a proposal seeking our Shareholders' views, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on the declassification of the New Cushman & Wakefield Board.

Cushman & Wakefield plc’s own tally for this item (“Bye-law Board Declassification Proposal”): 199,870,591 for, 8,258 against, per its Form 8-K filed October 16, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Cushman & Wakefield plc’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Declassify the Board of Directors” (5 managers, 3,757,261 for).

The 61 asset managers below reported 88,088,024 for.

Showing the 25 largest of 61 asset managers. See all 61 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Amend Articles of Incorporation

Cushman & Wakefield plc’s own tally for this item (“3. Articles Amendment Proposal”): 194,481,844 for, 8,592,750 against, per its Form 8-K filed October 16, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 5 asset managers below reported 3,757,261 for.

Description as filed by funds: Issue Shares in Connection with Acquisition

Cushman & Wakefield plc’s own tally for this item (“4. New Share Issuance Proposal”): 193,500,837 for, 9,573,845 against, per its Form 8-K filed October 16, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 5 asset managers below reported 3,757,261 for.

Description as filed by funds: To approve Advisory Resolution No. 2, Bye-law Provision: Business Combinations, a proposal seeking our Shareholders' views, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on the approval threshold in the New Cushman & Wakefield Bye-laws for mergers and certain other business combinations.

Cushman & Wakefield plc’s own tally for this item (“Bye-law Business Combinations Proposal”): 197,753,689 for, 2,125,951 against, per its Form 8-K filed October 16, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 63 asset managers below reported 86,818,232 for, 1,725,733 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 63 asset managers. See all 63 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve the General Meeting Adjournment Resolution, a proposal to approve the adjournment of the General Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional votes if there are insufficient votes in favor of the Scheme Resolutions.

The 63 asset managers below reported 80,282,741 for, 8,251,734 against, 9,490 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 63 asset managers. See all 63 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve the Shareholders Meeting Adjournment Resolution, a proposal to approve the adjournment of the Shareholders Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional votes if there are insufficient votes in favor of the Advisory Resolutions.

The 61 asset managers below reported 80,123,884 for, 7,964,140 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 61 asset managers. See all 61 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of our 2026 Omnibus Share and Cash Incentive Plan.

Cushman & Wakefield plc’s own tally for this item (“4. To approve the 2026 Plan”): 191,432,616 for, 17,159,619 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 92% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Cushman & Wakefield plc’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Approve Omnibus Stock Plan” (2 managers, 193,785 for).

The 96 asset managers below reported 109,601,490 for, 1,632,568 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 96 asset managers. See all 96 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the Proxy Statement ("Say-on-Pay").

Cushman & Wakefield plc’s own tally for this item (“3. To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in the Proxy Statement ("Say on Pay")”): 203,900,649 for, 4,706,771 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 96 managers: 110,792,292 for, 669,431 against, 22,990 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 286 managers: 102,489,998 for, 4,762,083 against, 5,564 abstained, 503 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Appointment of KPMG LLP as independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026, and authorization of the Audit Committee to set the independent auditor's remuneration.

Cushman & Wakefield plc’s own tally for this item (“2. To appoint KPMG LLP as independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2026 and to authorize the Audit Committee of its Board to set the independent auditor's remuneration”): 218,134,007 for, 1,923,817 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.1% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 111,056,846 for, 338,678 against, 22,990 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.