CSG Systems International, Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 29, 2025 (as amended or modified from time to time, the "merger agreement"), among CSG Systems International, Inc. ("CSG"), NEC Corporation ("Parent"), and Canvas Transaction Company, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub") (the "merger proposal"), pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, Merger Sub will be merged with and into CSG, the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub will cease, and CSG will survive the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the "merger"); a copy of the merger agreement is attached to the accompanying proxy statement as Annex A and is incorporated therein by reference;

CSG Systems International, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Merger Proposal”): 23,519,178 for, 5,392 against, per its Form 8-K filed January 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 13,425,569 for, 1,596 against, 31,357 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: SHAREHOLDERS OF CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ARE BEING ASKED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 29, 2025 AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AMONG CSG, NEC CORPORATION, AND NEC'S WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY CANVAS TRANSACTION COMPANY, INC. IN A REVERSE TRIANGULAR MERGER, CANVAS TRANSACTION COMPANY, INC. WILL MERGE INTO CSG, CEASE TO EXIST AS A SEPARATE ENTITY, AND CSG WILL BECOME A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF NEC. THE FULL MERGER AGREEMENT IS INCLUDED AS ANNEX A TO THE PROXY STATEMENT.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 5 managers: 20,195 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 2,150 for.

Description as filed by funds: Approve Merger Agreement

CSG Systems International, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“2. The proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the named executive officers of CSG in connection with the consummation of the Merger”): 16,182,120 for, 7,313,459 against, per its Form 8-K filed January 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 69% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 4 asset managers below reported 37,771 for, 21,368 not voted.

Description as filed by funds: To adjourn the special meeting from time to time, if necessary or appropriate, as determined in accordance with the merger agreement by the CSG board of directors, including for the purpose of soliciting additional votes for the approval of the merger proposal if there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the merger proposal.

The 99 asset managers below reported 12,995,046 for, 450,467 against, 33,974 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 99 asset managers. See all 99 in the interactive database.

The 4 asset managers below reported 37,771 for, 21,368 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to named executive officers of CSG in connection with the consummation of the merger; and

CSG Systems International, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“2. The proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the named executive officers of CSG in connection with the consummation of the Merger”): 16,182,120 for, 7,313,459 against, per its Form 8-K filed January 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 69% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 98 managers: 8,944,851 for, 4,500,734 against, 33,974 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 256 managers: 9,471,037 for, 2,883,451 against, 17,443 abstained, 356 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 4 managers: 36,132 for, 1,639 against, 21,368 not voted.

Institutional-manager reports, all 5 managers: 37,294 for, 1,909 against.