CRISPR THERAPEUTICS AG 2024-2025 Proxy Voting Records

The 51 asset managers below reported 18,324,341 for, 0 against, 0 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 51 asset managers. See all 51 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: i Re-election of Christian Rommel, Ph.D.

CRISPR THERAPEUTICS AG’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Christian Rommel, Ph.D.”): 39,928,435 for, 899,491 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 4 – Election or Re-election of the Members to the Board of Directors and the Chairman Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D., Ali Behbahani, M.D., Maria Fardis, Ph.D., H. Edward Fleming Jr., M.D., Simeon J. George, M.D., John T. Greene, Katherine A. High, M.D., Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M., Christian Rommel, P…”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 51 asset managers below reported 17,924,922 for, 396,549 against, 2,840 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 51 asset managers. See all 51 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: j Re-election of Douglas A. Treco, Ph.D.

CRISPR THERAPEUTICS AG’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Douglas A. Treco, Ph.D.”): 38,935,855 for, 1,892,354 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 4 – Election or Re-election of the Members to the Board of Directors and the Chairman Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D., Ali Behbahani, M.D., Maria Fardis, Ph.D., H. Edward Fleming Jr., M.D., Simeon J. George, M.D., John T. Greene, Katherine A. High, M.D., Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M., Christian Rommel, P…”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 51 asset managers below reported 17,647,540 for, 676,771 against, 0 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 51 asset managers. See all 51 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: g Re-election of Katherine A. High, M.D.

CRISPR THERAPEUTICS AG’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Katherine A. High, M.D.”): 39,882,598 for, 946,656 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 4 – Election or Re-election of the Members to the Board of Directors and the Chairman Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D., Ali Behbahani, M.D., Maria Fardis, Ph.D., H. Edward Fleming Jr., M.D., Simeon J. George, M.D., John T. Greene, Katherine A. High, M.D., Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M., Christian Rommel, P…”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 51 asset managers below reported 17,927,762 for, 396,549 against, 0 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 51 asset managers. See all 51 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: c Re-election of Maria Fardis, Ph.D.

CRISPR THERAPEUTICS AG’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Maria Fardis, Ph.D.”): 39,931,396 for, 898,012 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 4 – Election or Re-election of the Members to the Board of Directors and the Chairman Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D., Ali Behbahani, M.D., Maria Fardis, Ph.D., H. Edward Fleming Jr., M.D., Simeon J. George, M.D., John T. Greene, Katherine A. High, M.D., Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M., Christian Rommel, P…”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 51 asset managers below reported 17,927,762 for, 396,549 against, 0 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 51 asset managers. See all 51 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election or re-election of the members to the Board of Directors and the Chairman: 4.a Re-election of Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D., as member and Chairman

CRISPR THERAPEUTICS AG’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D.”): 40,043,203 for, 785,309 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 4 – Election or Re-election of the Members to the Board of Directors and the Chairman Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D., Ali Behbahani, M.D., Maria Fardis, Ph.D., H. Edward Fleming Jr., M.D., Simeon J. George, M.D., John T. Greene, Katherine A. High, M.D., Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M., Christian Rommel, P…”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 51 asset managers below reported 18,302,011 for, 22,300 against, 0 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 51 asset managers. See all 51 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: h Re-election of Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M.

CRISPR THERAPEUTICS AG’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M.”): 39,915,991 for, 918,369 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 4 – Election or Re-election of the Members to the Board of Directors and the Chairman Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D., Ali Behbahani, M.D., Maria Fardis, Ph.D., H. Edward Fleming Jr., M.D., Simeon J. George, M.D., John T. Greene, Katherine A. High, M.D., Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M., Christian Rommel, P…”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 51 asset managers below reported 17,927,762 for, 396,549 against, 0 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 51 asset managers. See all 51 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: e Re-election of Simeon J. George, M.D.

CRISPR THERAPEUTICS AG’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Simeon J. George, M.D.”): 39,938,669 for, 894,244 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 4 – Election or Re-election of the Members to the Board of Directors and the Chairman Samarth Kulkarni, Ph.D., Ali Behbahani, M.D., Maria Fardis, Ph.D., H. Edward Fleming Jr., M.D., Simeon J. George, M.D., John T. Greene, Katherine A. High, M.D., Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M., Christian Rommel, P…”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 51 asset managers below reported 17,927,762 for, 396,549 against, 0 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 51 asset managers. See all 51 in the interactive database.

The 50 asset managers below reported 18,324,241 for, 0 against, 0 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Binding vote on maximum non- performance-related compensation for members of the Board of Directors from the 2025 Annual General Meeting to the 2026 annual general meeting of shareholders.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 21 managers: 10,184,111 for, 0 against, 0 abstained.

Institutional-manager reports, all 16 managers: 3,154,571 for, 310 against.

Description as filed by funds: Binding vote on maximum equity for members of the Board of Directors from the 2025 Annual General Meeting to the 2026 annual general meeting of shareholders.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 21 managers: 9,761,414 for, 422,696 against, 0 abstained.

Institutional-manager reports, all 9 managers: 1,552,744 for, 310 against.

The 29 asset managers below reported 5,727,410 for, 2,409,220 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 29 asset managers. See all 29 in the interactive database.

The 29 asset managers below reported 7,889,690 for, 246,940 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 29 asset managers. See all 29 in the interactive database.

The 29 asset managers below reported 7,853,464 for, 283,166 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 29 asset managers. See all 29 in the interactive database.

The 29 asset managers below reported 7,892,613 for, 244,017 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 29 asset managers. See all 29 in the interactive database.

The 29 asset managers below reported 7,889,690 for, 246,940 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 29 asset managers. See all 29 in the interactive database.

The 29 asset managers below reported 7,853,464 for, 283,166 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 29 asset managers. See all 29 in the interactive database.

The 29 asset managers below reported 7,892,613 for, 244,017 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 29 asset managers. See all 29 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: b Binding vote on maximum equity for members of the Board of Directors from the 2025 Annual General Meeting to the 2026 annual general meeting of shareholders.

The 29 asset managers below reported 7,635,060 for, 501,570 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 29 asset managers. See all 29 in the interactive database.

The 29 asset managers below reported 5,727,203 for, 2,409,427 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 29 asset managers. See all 29 in the interactive database.

The 27 asset managers below reported 9,920,475 for, 267,947 against, 0 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. See all 27 in the interactive database.

The 27 asset managers below reported 9,810,315 for, 378,107 against, 0 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. See all 27 in the interactive database.

The 27 asset managers below reported 9,800,293 for, 388,129 against, 0 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. See all 27 in the interactive database.

The 26 asset managers below reported 9,962,554 for, 267,947 against, 0 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 26 asset managers. See all 26 in the interactive database.

The 26 asset managers below reported 9,666,688 for, 521,540 against, 0 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 26 asset managers. See all 26 in the interactive database.

The 51 asset managers below reported 18,324,341 for, 0 against, 0 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 51 asset managers. See all 51 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of the Swiss management report, the consolidated financial statements and the statutory financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2024.

The 50 asset managers below reported 18,324,241 for, 0 against, 0 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

The 50 asset managers below reported 18,324,241 for, 0 against, 0 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Transact any other business that may properly come before the 2025 Annual General Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The 50 asset managers below reported 9,662,324 for, 8,659,077 against, 2,840 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Binding vote on maximum variable compensation for members of the Executive Committee for the current year ending December 31, 2025.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 21 managers: 9,885,130 for, 298,981 against, 0 abstained.

Institutional-manager reports, all 15 managers: 3,154,161 for, 510 against.

Description as filed by funds: Binding vote on maximum equity for members of the Executive Committee from the 2025 Annual General Meeting to the 2026 annual general meeting of shareholders.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 21 managers: 9,749,774 for, 434,336 against, 0 abstained.

Institutional-manager reports, all 10 managers: 1,577,904 for, 310 against.

Description as filed by funds: d Binding vote on maximum variable compensation for members of the Executive Committee for the current year ending December 31, 2025.

The 29 asset managers below reported 7,483,212 for, 653,418 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 29 asset managers. See all 29 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: e Binding vote on maximum equity for members of the Executive Committee from the 2025 Annual General Meeting to the 2026 annual general meeting of shareholders.

The 29 asset managers below reported 7,262,000 for, 874,630 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 29 asset managers. See all 29 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Non-binding advisory vote on the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers under U.S. securities law requirements.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 15,155,999 for, 3,164,742 against, 0 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.