Comerica Incorporated 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among Fifth Third Bancorp, Fifth Third Financial Corporation, Comerica Incorporated and Comerica Holdings Incorporated, dated as of October 5, 2025.

Comerica Incorporated’s own tally for this item (“1. Proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 5, 2025, by and among Fifth Third, Fifth Third Financial Corporation, Comerica and Comerica Holdings Incorporated (the "Comerica Merger Proposal"”): 93,651,601 for, 2,795,960 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed January 6, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The stockholders approved the Comerica Merger Proposal by the following votes:”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a supermajority of the shares outstanding (“75.5% of the shares of common stock outstanding”).

The 104 asset managers below reported 43,018,439 for, 155,354 against, 1,086 abstained, 97 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 104 asset managers. See all 104 in the interactive database.

The 5 asset managers below reported 190,467 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Proposal to approve the adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if, immediately prior to such adjournment, there are not sufficient votes to adopt the Comerica merger proposal or to ensure that any supplement or amendment to the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus is timely provided.

Comerica Incorporated’s own tally for this item (“3. Proposal to approve the adjournment or postponement of the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if, immediately prior to such adjournment, there are not sufficient votes to appro”): 91,018,394 for, 5,133,993 against, per its Form 8-K filed January 6, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 103 asset managers below reported 42,809,031 for, 336,985 against, 22,727 abstained, 97 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 103 asset managers. See all 103 in the interactive database.

The 5 asset managers below reported 188,467 for, 2,000 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Proposal to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the merger- related compensation payments that will or may be paid to Comerica's named executive officers in connection with the first merger.

Comerica Incorporated’s own tally for this item (“2. Proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the merger-related compensation payments that will or may be paid to Comerica's named executive officers in connection with the first merger (the "Comerica Compen”): 54,715,121 for, 40,823,085 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed January 6, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The stockholders approved the Comerica Compensation Proposal by the following votes:”
Support: 57% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 105 managers: 32,007,327 for, 11,192,971 against, 22,727 abstained, 191 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 408 managers: 24,084,699 for, 25,034,410 against, 500,136 abstained, 16,384 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 5 managers: 190,467 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 8 managers: 103,696 for, 1,052,169 against.