Chegg, Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Election of two Class I directors and one Class III director: Dan Rosensweig (Class I)

Chegg, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Dan Rosensweig (Class I)”): 34,892,584 for, 10,617,103 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 17, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The nominated directors were elected and the other proposals were approved by the required stockholder vote.”
Support: 77% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 23 asset managers below reported 12,241,483 for, 1,578,908 against.

Description as filed by funds: Election of two Class I directors and one Class III director: Renee Budig (Class III)

Chegg, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Renee Budig (Class III)”): 35,433,388 for, 10,076,087 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 17, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The nominated directors were elected and the other proposals were approved by the required stockholder vote.”
Support: 78% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 23 asset managers below reported 12,629,015 for, 1,191,377 against.

Description as filed by funds: Election of two Class I directors and one Class III director: Ted Schlein (Class I)

Chegg, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Ted Schlein (Class I)”): 34,137,193 for, 11,364,248 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 17, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The nominated directors were elected and the other proposals were approved by the required stockholder vote.”
Support: 75% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 23 asset managers below reported 12,629,006 for, 1,191,386 against.

Description as filed by funds: To approve an amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock at a ratio ranging between 1-for-4 and 1-for-15.

Chegg, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“4. To approve an amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock at a ratio ranging from between 1-for-4 and 1-for-15 (the "Reverse Stock Split"), wi”): 77,625,747 for, 7,324,294 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 17, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 4: To approve an amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock at a ratio ranging from between 1-for-4 and 1-for-15 (the "Reverse Stock Split"), with the determination of whether to effect the Reverse Stock Split and …”
Support: 91% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 23 asset managers below reported 13,687,051 for, 133,341 against.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Chegg, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“2. To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2025”): 34,129,514 for, 11,226,027 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 17, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 75% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 21 managers: 13,022,290 for, 797,491 against, 1 abstained.

Institutional-manager reports, all 85 managers: 18,322,134 for, 1,245,791 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.

Chegg, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“3. To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026”): 80,912,997 for, 4,153,126 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 17, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 23 asset managers below reported 13,820,386 for, 5 against.