Cactus, Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Election of Class II and Class III Directors Class II Nominees: Alan Semple

Cactus, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Alan Semple (Class II)”): 72,046,953 for, 2,397,484 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “At that meeting, stockholders of the Company voted on the three proposals outlined in the Company's Proxy Statement as set forth below: Proposal 1 : The Company's stockholders elected to the board of directors of the Company each of the following Class II and Class III director nominees to serve un…”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 102 asset managers below reported 41,657,086 for, 656,692 against, 23,182 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 102 asset managers. See all 102 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Class II and Class III Directors Class II Nominees: Joel Bender

Cactus, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Joel Bender (Class II)”): 73,770,282 for, 658,132 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “At that meeting, stockholders of the Company voted on the three proposals outlined in the Company's Proxy Statement as set forth below: Proposal 1 : The Company's stockholders elected to the board of directors of the Company each of the following Class II and Class III director nominees to serve un…”
Support: 99.1% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 102 asset managers below reported 42,313,712 for, 66 against, 23,182 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 102 asset managers. See all 102 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Class II and Class III Directors Class II Nominees: Tana Utley

Cactus, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Tana Utley (Class II)”): 74,419,299 for, 9,894 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “At that meeting, stockholders of the Company voted on the three proposals outlined in the Company's Proxy Statement as set forth below: Proposal 1 : The Company's stockholders elected to the board of directors of the Company each of the following Class II and Class III director nominees to serve un…”
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 102 asset managers below reported 42,313,778 for, 23,182 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 102 asset managers. See all 102 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Class II and Class III Directors Class III Nominees: Gary Rosenthal

Cactus, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Gary Rosenthal (Class III)”): 65,781,966 for, 7,981,651 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “At that meeting, stockholders of the Company voted on the three proposals outlined in the Company's Proxy Statement as set forth below: Proposal 1 : The Company's stockholders elected to the board of directors of the Company each of the following Class II and Class III director nominees to serve un…”
Support: 89% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 102 asset managers below reported 39,034,992 for, 3,278,784 against, 23,187 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 102 asset managers. See all 102 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Class II and Class III Directors Class III Nominees: Scott Bender

Cactus, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Scott Bender (Class III)”): 73,753,144 for, 703,573 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “At that meeting, stockholders of the Company voted on the three proposals outlined in the Company's Proxy Statement as set forth below: Proposal 1 : The Company's stockholders elected to the board of directors of the Company each of the following Class II and Class III director nominees to serve un…”
Support: 99.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 102 asset managers below reported 42,308,142 for, 5,636 against, 23,182 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 102 asset managers. See all 102 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as reported in the Proxy Statement.

Cactus, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“3. On a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as reported in the Proxy Statement”): 73,305,285 for, 1,137,758 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 3 : The Company's stockholders approved on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as reported in the Proxy Statement.”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 102 managers: 42,280,522 for, 33,255 against, 23,182 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 272 managers: 38,252,022 for, 346,123 against, 948 abstained, 345 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.

Cactus, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“2. The ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026”): 75,549,462 for, 330,570 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2 : The Company's stockholders approved the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.”
Support: 99.5% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 102 asset managers below reported 42,284,254 for, 29,523 against, 23,182 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 102 asset managers. See all 102 in the interactive database.