Burford Capital Ltd. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To elect Rick Noel as director.

Burford Capital Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Rick Noel”): 128,385,711 for, 6,081,385 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 50 asset managers below reported 28,784,096 for, 1 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect Christopher Bogart as director.

Burford Capital Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Christopher Bogart”): 130,297,140 for, 4,162,324 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 50 asset managers below reported 28,784,096 for, 1 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect Christopher Halmy as director.

Burford Capital Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Christopher Halmy”): 127,348,261 for, 7,100,867 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 50 asset managers below reported 28,784,096 for, 1 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect John Sievwright as director.

Burford Capital Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: John Sievwright”): 113,422,751 for, 20,361,138 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 85% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 50 asset managers below reported 19,929,374 for, 8,854,723 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect Pamela Corrie as director.

Burford Capital Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Pamela Corrie”): 128,188,987 for, 5,919,084 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 50 asset managers below reported 28,767,282 for, 16,815 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect Robert Gillespie as director.

Burford Capital Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Robert Gillespie”): 125,042,902 for, 9,400,071 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 93% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 50 asset managers below reported 28,007,930 for, 776,167 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-elect Rukia Baruti Dames as director.

Burford Capital Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Rukia Baruti Dames”): 126,895,133 for, 7,219,744 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 50 asset managers below reported 28,767,282 for, 16,815 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To authorize the Company to make market acquisitions of its ordinary shares up to a specified amount.

Burford Capital Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Resolution 14—To authorize the Company to make market acquisitions of its Ordinary Shares up to a specified amount.”): 148,284,344 for, 3,009,217 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 51 asset managers below reported 28,784,101 for, 1 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 51 asset managers. See all 51 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To authorize the Board of Directors to allot and/or issue equity securities of the Company for cash without making a pre-emptive offer to shareholders (subject to the limitations set forth in the resolution) for an acquisition or specified capital investment.

The 50 asset managers below reported 28,784,096 for, 1 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To authorize the Board of Directors to allot and/or issue unissued ordinary shares in the Company and grant rights to subscribe for, or to convert any security into, ordinary shares in the Company up to a specified amount.

The 50 asset managers below reported 28,784,096 for, 1 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To authorize the Board of Directors to allot and/or issue equity securities of the Company for cash without making a pre-emptive offer to shareholders (subject to the limitations set forth in the resolution).

The 48 asset managers below reported 28,400,458 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 48 asset managers. See all 48 in the interactive database.

The 31 asset managers below reported 17,054,097 for, 1 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 31 asset managers. See all 31 in the interactive database.

The 14 asset managers below reported 9,982,672 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2026 annual general meeting of shareholders under "Executive compensation", including the compensation discussion and analysis, the compensation tables and the related narrative discussion included therein ("Say-on-Pay").

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 49 managers: 17,754,629 for, 10,853,964 against, 175,000 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 154 managers: 52,767,415 for, 18,815,687 against, 4,470,377 abstained, 259 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To authorize the audit committee of the Board of Directors to agree to the compensation of the Company's external auditor.

The 52 asset managers below reported 28,862,996 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. See all 52 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To re-appoint KPMG LLP as the Company's external auditor and independent registered public accounting firm.

Burford Capital Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Resolution 9—To reappoint KPMG LLP as the Company's external auditor and independent registered public accounting firm until the next general meeting of the Company at which accounts are laid.”): 151,187,720 for, 153,281 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 14, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 50 asset managers below reported 28,784,097 for.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To receive the accounts of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2025 and the report of the Board of Directors and the external auditor thereon.

The 50 asset managers below reported 28,784,097 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. See all 50 in the interactive database.