BLACK STONE MINERALS L P 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Election of directors to the board of directors of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s general partner, each to serve until the 2025 annual meeting of limited partners and thereafter until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until such director's earlier death, resignation or removal: AJ Longmaid

BLACK STONE MINERALS L P’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: AJ Longmaid”): 100,200,755 for, 1,107,662 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed June 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors Each of the nine nominees for director was duly elected by the Partnership's unitholders, with votes as follows: 2”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,110,251 for.

Description as filed by funds: Election of directors to the board of directors of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s general partner, each to serve until the 2025 annual meeting of limited partners and thereafter until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until such director's earlier death, resignation or removal: Alexander D. Stuart

BLACK STONE MINERALS L P’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Alexander D. Stuart”): 100,811,608 for, 496,808 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed June 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors Each of the nine nominees for director was duly elected by the Partnership's unitholders, with votes as follows: 2”
Support: 99.5% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,110,251 for.

Description as filed by funds: Election of directors to the board of directors of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s general partner, each to serve until the 2025 annual meeting of limited partners and thereafter until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until such director's earlier death, resignation or removal: Carin M. Barth

BLACK STONE MINERALS L P’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Carin M. Barth”): 100,772,940 for, 535,477 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed June 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors Each of the nine nominees for director was duly elected by the Partnership's unitholders, with votes as follows: 2”
Support: 99.4% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,110,251 for.

Description as filed by funds: Election of directors to the board of directors of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s general partner, each to serve until the 2025 annual meeting of limited partners and thereafter until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until such director's earlier death, resignation or removal: D. Mark DeWalch

BLACK STONE MINERALS L P’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: D. Mark DeWalch”): 99,070,664 for, 2,237,752 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed June 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors Each of the nine nominees for director was duly elected by the Partnership's unitholders, with votes as follows: 2”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 16 asset managers below reported 2,218,664 for, 891,587 withheld.

Description as filed by funds: Election of directors to the board of directors of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s general partner, each to serve until the 2025 annual meeting of limited partners and thereafter until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until such director's earlier death, resignation or removal: James W. Whitehead

BLACK STONE MINERALS L P’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: James W. Whitehead”): 100,918,224 for, 390,189 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed June 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors Each of the nine nominees for director was duly elected by the Partnership's unitholders, with votes as follows: 2”
Support: 99.6% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,110,251 for.

Description as filed by funds: Election of directors to the board of directors of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s general partner, each to serve until the 2025 annual meeting of limited partners and thereafter until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until such director's earlier death, resignation or removal: Jerry V. Kyle, Jr.

BLACK STONE MINERALS L P’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Jerry V. Kyle, Jr.”): 100,839,012 for, 469,405 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed June 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors Each of the nine nominees for director was duly elected by the Partnership's unitholders, with votes as follows: 2”
Support: 99.5% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,110,251 for.

Description as filed by funds: Election of directors to the board of directors of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s general partner, each to serve until the 2025 annual meeting of limited partners and thereafter until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until such director's earlier death, resignation or removal: Michael C. Linn

BLACK STONE MINERALS L P’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Michael C. Linn”): 100,585,174 for, 723,242 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed June 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors Each of the nine nominees for director was duly elected by the Partnership's unitholders, with votes as follows: 2”
Support: 99.2% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,110,251 for.

Description as filed by funds: Election of directors to the board of directors of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s general partner, each to serve until the 2025 annual meeting of limited partners and thereafter until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until such director's earlier death, resignation or removal: Thomas L. Carter, Jr.

BLACK STONE MINERALS L P’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Thomas L. Carter, Jr.”): 100,895,012 for, 413,405 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed June 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors Each of the nine nominees for director was duly elected by the Partnership's unitholders, with votes as follows: 2”
Support: 99.5% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,110,251 for.

Description as filed by funds: Election of directors to the board of directors of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s general partner, each to serve until the 2025 annual meeting of limited partners and thereafter until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until such director's earlier death, resignation or removal: William E. Randall

BLACK STONE MINERALS L P’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: William E. Randall”): 100,478,013 for, 830,404 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed June 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors Each of the nine nominees for director was duly elected by the Partnership's unitholders, with votes as follows: 2”
Support: 99.1% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,110,251 for.

Description as filed by funds: Election of directors to the board of directors of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s general partner, each to serve until the 2025 annual meeting of limited partners and thereafter until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until such director's earlier death, resignation or removal: William N. Mathis

BLACK STONE MINERALS L P’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: William N. Mathis”): 99,197,262 for, 2,111,155 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed June 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors Each of the nine nominees for director was duly elected by the Partnership's unitholders, with votes as follows: 2”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 16 asset managers below reported 2,932,233 for, 178,018 withheld.

Description as filed by funds: Approval on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of the executive officers of Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s general partner for the year ended December 31, 2023

BLACK STONE MINERALS L P’s own tally for this item (“3. Approval, on a Non-binding Advisory Basis, of the Compensation of the General Partner's Named Executive Officers The compensation of the General Partner's named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31”): 98,403,514 for, 2,101,058 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 18, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 3 – Approval, on a Non-binding Advisory Basis, of the Compensation of the General Partner's Named Executive Officers The compensation of the General Partner's named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 was approved, on a non-binding advisory basis, by the Partners…”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 16 managers: 3,110,251 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 130 managers: 14,925,604 for, 2,000 against, 300 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approval on a non-binding advisory basis, the preferred frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 16 managers: 935,900 for, 2,081,859 1 year, 92,492 3 year.

Institutional-manager reports, all 129 managers: 194,121 for, 14,632,838 1 year, 239,285 3 year, 3,623 2 year, 2,000 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

The 5 asset managers below reported 403,489 for, 177,158 withheld, 225 1 year. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024.

BLACK STONE MINERALS L P’s own tally for this item (“2. Ratification of Appointment of the Partnership's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Partnership's independent registered public accounting firm for the year endin”): 160,241,585 for, 262,220 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 18, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2 – Ratification of Appointment of the Partnership's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Partnership's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024 was ratified by the Partnership's unitholders, wi…”
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 18 asset managers below reported 3,111,976 for.