Amrize Ltd. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Discharge of the members of the Board and the Executive Management from liability for activities during fiscal year 2025

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“9. Discharge of the members of the Board and the Executive Management from liability for activities during fiscal year 2025”): 231,346,134 for, 1,053,793 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.5% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Amrize Ltd.’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “APPROVE DISCHARGE OF BOARD AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT” (3 managers, 793,218 for).

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,093,002 for, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Re-election and Election of the Board: Election of Don P. Newman

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Don P. Newman”): 234,254,861 for, 285,726 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,736,493 for, 149,727 against, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Re-election and Election of the Board: Election of Jacques Wolf Sanche

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Jacques Wolf Sanche”): 234,226,378 for, 320,069 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,736,493 for, 149,727 against, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Re-election and Election of the Board: Re-election of Dwight Gibson

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Dwight Gibson”): 234,000,959 for, 543,785 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.7% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,736,493 for, 149,727 against, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Re-election and Election of the Board: Re-election of Holli Ladhani

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Holli Ladhani”): 233,783,377 for, 763,385 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.6% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,736,493 for, 149,727 against, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Re-election and Election of the Board: Re-election of Jurg Oleas

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Jürg Oleas”): 232,426,047 for, 2,119,457 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,736,493 for, 149,727 against, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Re-election and Election of the Board: Re-election of Michael E. McKelvy

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Michael E. McKelvy”): 232,769,435 for, 1,778,026 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.2% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,736,493 for, 149,727 against, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Re-election and Election of the Board: Re-election of Robert Rivkin

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Robert Rivkin”): 232,817,993 for, 1,722,392 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.2% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,736,493 for, 149,727 against, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Re-election of Advoro Zurich Ltd as Independent Voting Representative

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“16. Re-election of Advoro Zurich Ltd as Independent Voting Representative”): 240,248,273 for, 47,417 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,886,220 for, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Re-election of Jan Jenisch as Chairman of the Board

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“11. Re-election of Jan Jenisch as Chairman”): 186,920,403 for, 47,580,897 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 80% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 53,632,837 for, 4,460,165 against, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

The 58 asset managers below reported 52,768,467 for, 149,727 against, 1,387,564 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 58 asset managers. See all 58 in the interactive database.

The 58 asset managers below reported 52,768,467 for, 149,727 against, 1,387,564 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 58 asset managers. See all 58 in the interactive database.

The 58 asset managers below reported 52,768,467 for, 149,727 against, 1,387,564 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 58 asset managers. See all 58 in the interactive database.

The 56 asset managers below reported 52,771,507 for, 1,357,969 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 56 asset managers. See all 56 in the interactive database.

The 56 asset managers below reported 52,771,507 for, 1,357,969 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 56 asset managers. See all 56 in the interactive database.

The 56 asset managers below reported 52,771,507 for, 1,357,969 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 56 asset managers. See all 56 in the interactive database.

The 56 asset managers below reported 52,771,507 for, 1,357,969 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 56 asset managers. See all 56 in the interactive database.

The 24 asset managers below reported 5,171,898 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 24 asset managers below reported 5,171,898 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 24 asset managers below reported 5,171,898 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: RE-ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: JAN JENISCH

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Jan Jenisch”): 212,466,407 for, 22,121,967 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 91% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 9 asset managers below reported 1,516,336 for, 149,727 against, 29,595 not voted.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of a special distribution of legal reserves from capital contribution in the amount of USD 0.44 per outstanding share

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“7. Approval of a special distribution of legal reserves from capital contribution in the amount of USD 0.44 per outstanding share (the "Special Dividend")”): 239,994,010 for, 299,262 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,886,220 for, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of the regular distribution of legal reserves from capital contribution in the amount of up to USD 0.44 per outstanding share in up to four (4) installments

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“8. Approval of the regular distribution of legal reserves from capital contribution in the amount of up to USD 0.44 per outstanding share (the "Ordinary Dividend") in up to four (4) installments”): 239,971,939 for, 327,326 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,093,002 for, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Offsetting of accumulated losses for fiscal year 2025

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“6. Offsetting of accumulated losses for fiscal year 2025”): 240,152,626 for, 83,137 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,093,002 for, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Advisory vote on the Non-Financial Matters Report for fiscal year 2025

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“5. Advisory vote on the Non-Financial Matters Report for fiscal year 2025”): 217,821,855 for, 22,071,119 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 91% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,010,713 for, 29,969 against, 52,320 abstained, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of the Annual Report, including the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Statutory Financial Statements of Amrize for fiscal year 2025

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“1. Approval of the Annual Report, including the consolidated financial statements and the statutory financial statements of Amrize for fiscal year 2025”): 240,168,463 for, 47,964 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 80 asset managers below reported 58,886,220 for, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 80 asset managers. See all 80 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: If any modifications to agenda items or proposals identified in the invitation to the 2026 Annual General Meeting or other matters on which voting is permissible under Swiss law are properly presented at the 2026 Annual General Meeting for consideration, you hereby instruct the Independent Voting Representative, in the absence of other specific instructions, to vote the shares in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.

The 59 asset managers below reported 2,754,127 for, 50,591,567 against, 1,387,564 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 59 asset managers. See all 59 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of the maximum aggregate compensation for the Board for the period from the 2026 Annual General Meeting to the 2027 Annual General Meeting

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“13. Approval of the maximum aggregate compensation for the Board for the period from the 2026 Annual General Meeting to the 2027 Annual General Meeting”): 232,003,641 for, 2,337,243 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 88 asset managers below reported 58,360,562 for, 149,727 against, 1,387,564 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 88 asset managers. See all 88 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2025 ("Say on Pay Vote")

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“2. Advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2025”): 220,783,415 for, 13,629,752 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 94% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 80 managers: 58,662,768 for, 223,452 against, 1,387,564 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 325 managers: 153,793,026 for, 7,205,983 against, 81,948 abstained, 7,546,803 not voted, 28,291 1 year. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 74 managers: 894,474 for, 1,357,969 not voted, 54,559,558 1 year, 2,195,659 3 year. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 290 managers: 2,831,131 for, 117,450 against, 292,412 abstained, 3,978,051 not voted, 144,403,825 1 year, 1,085,701 3 year, 5,630 2 year, 36 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of the maximum aggregate compensation for the Executive Management for fiscal year 2027

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“14. Approval of the maximum aggregate compensation for the Executive Management for fiscal year 2027”): 220,519,854 for, 13,787,600 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 94% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 80 managers: 57,943,275 for, 149,727 against, 1,387,564 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 11 managers: 663,278 for, 88 against.

Description as filed by funds: Advisory vote on the Swiss Statutory Remuneration Report for fiscal year 2025

Amrize Ltd.’s own tally for this item (“4. Advisory vote on the Swiss Statutory Remuneration Report for fiscal year 2025”): 221,063,459 for, 13,354,892 against, per its Form 8-K filed April 21, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 94% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a supermajority of the votes cast (“98% of the votes cast”).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 80 managers: 57,869,550 for, 223,452 against, 1,387,564 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 4 managers: 12,204,693 for, 4,900 against.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 6 managers: 334,320 for, 29,595 not voted.