Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To consider and vote on a proposal to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 8, 2025 (as it may be amended from time to time), by and among Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., Tropic Purchaser LLC and Tropic Merger Sub LLC, pursuant to which, upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. will merge with and into Tropic Merger Sub LLC (which we refer to as the "merger"), with Tropic Merger Sub LLC continuing as the surviving company (which proposal we refer to as the "merger agreement proposal").

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“1. A proposal to approve the Merger Agreement (the " Merger Agreement Proposal ")”): 57,355,918 for, 424,197 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed March 10, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Based on the final, certified voting report provided by the independent inspector of election, the Company's shareholders approved all proposals considered at the Special Meeting.”
Support: 99.2% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a supermajority of the shares outstanding (“79.50% of the shares of common stock entitled to vote”).

The 82 asset managers below reported 31,467,659 for, 1 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 82 asset managers. See all 82 in the interactive database.

The 4 asset managers below reported 863,377 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: TO CONSIDER AND VOTE ON A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ANY ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETING, IF NECESSARY, FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOLICITING ADDITIONAL PROXIES IF THERE ARE NOT SUFFICIENT VOTES AT THE SPECIAL MEETING TO APPROVE THE MERGER AGREEMENT PROPOSAL.

The 81 asset managers below reported 30,113,746 for, 1,353,265 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 81 asset managers. See all 81 in the interactive database.

The 4 asset managers below reported 863,377 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: TO CONSIDER AND VOTE ON A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE, ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS, THE COMPENSATION THAT MAY BE PAID OR BECOME PAYABLE TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS THAT IS BASED ON OR OTHERWISE RELATES TO THE MERGER.

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“2. A proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the Company's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the Merger (the " Advisor”): 56,435,334 for, 867,723 against, per its Form 8-K filed March 10, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 81 managers: 31,413,840 for, 53,171 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 246 managers: 25,856,545 for, 160,604 against, 9,295 abstained, 28,100 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

The 6 asset managers below reported 869,137 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.