AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP INC. 2024-2025 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 3, 2024 (the "merger agreement"), by and among Air Transport Services Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), Stonepeak Nile Parent LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Parent"), and Stonepeak Nile MergerCo Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("MergerCo"), pursuant to which and subject to the terms and conditions thereof, MergerCo will be merged with and into the Company (the "merger"), with the Company surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent, and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement (the "Merger Agreement Proposal");

AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP INC.’s own tally for this item (“1. Merger Agreement Proposal”): 54,065,789 for, 78,369 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed February 10, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 was approved, a vote on the adjournment proposal (”
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 69 asset managers below reported 20,815,431 for, 54,130 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 69 asset managers. See all 69 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve any adjournment of the special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the special meeting to approve the merger agreement proposal (the "Adjournment Proposal").

The 67 asset managers below reported 19,525,447 for, 1,249,584 against, 54,130 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 67 asset managers. See all 67 in the interactive database.

The 2 asset managers below reported 40,400 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, by advisory (non-binding) vote, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the Company's named executive officers in connection with the consummation of the merger (the "Advisory Compensation Proposal"); and

AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP INC.’s own tally for this item (“2. Advisory Compensation Proposal”): 40,835,321 for, 12,366,494 against, per its Form 8-K filed February 10, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 77% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 66 managers: 13,010,986 for, 7,776,705 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 156 managers: 28,859,124 for, 8,755,489 against, 701,216 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 2 managers: 40,400 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 41,042 against.