proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › WILMINGTON FUNDS › 2025-2026

WILMINGTON FUNDS proxy voting record, 2025-2026

WILMINGTON FUNDS reported 31,447 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 24,959 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.3% of the time. On the 284 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 9.5% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.3% FOR of 24,959 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 23,280 AGAINST 1,308 Abstained or withheld 371

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

9.5% FOR of 284 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 282.

FOR 27 AGAINST 257 Abstained 0

See the 27 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

WILMINGTON FUNDS, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (50 inferred) 16,545 16,124 96.1% 3.9% 377
Director Elections Shareholders (3 inferred) 3 3 0.0% 100.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board 3,584 3,557 95.1% 4.9% 25
Corporate Governance Shareholders (3 inferred) 421 419 52.7% 47.3% 2
Compensation Board (35 inferred) 2,494 2,481 86.1% 13.9% 13
Compensation Shareholders (3 inferred) 39 38 26.3% 73.7% 0
Capital Structure Board 2,506 2,506 94.5% 5.5% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 22 22 54.5% 45.5% 0
Audit-related Board 2,166 2,165 96.8% 3.2% 1
Audit-related Shareholders (1 inferred) 9 8 100.0% 0.0% 1
Say-on-Pay Board 1,330 1,258 89.9% 10.1% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (1 inferred) 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 119 119 99.2% 0.8% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 206 204 8.3% 91.7% 0
Other Board 222 196 39.8% 60.2% 26
Other Shareholders 23 23 39.1% 60.9% 0
Environment or Climate Board 55 55 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 189 189 5.8% 94.2% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 177 177 89.3% 10.7% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 2 2 0.0% 100.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 41 41 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 77 77 0.0% 100.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 74 70 91.4% 8.6% 4
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (1 inferred) 31 31 67.7% 32.3% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 41 41 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 61 61 8.2% 91.8% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (97 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where WILMINGTON FUNDS broke with the board (1,443 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
WILMINGTON FUNDS filed 31,447 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 29,374 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,902 issuer names and 5 funds. They cover 23,288 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
121 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type72 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote49 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

WILMINGTON FUNDS proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).