proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › WILMINGTON FUNDS › 2024-2025

WILMINGTON FUNDS proxy voting record, 2024-2025

WILMINGTON FUNDS reported 32,155 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 25,450 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.8% of the time. On the 438 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 14.2% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.8% FOR of 25,450 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 23,868 AGAINST 1,208 Abstained or withheld 374

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

14.2% FOR of 438 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 435.

FOR 62 AGAINST 376 Abstained 0

See the 62 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

WILMINGTON FUNDS, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (46 inferred) 16,963 16,533 96.2% 3.8% 372
Director Elections Shareholders 3 3 33.3% 66.7% 0
Corporate Governance Board 3,554 3,536 95.0% 5.0% 16
Corporate Governance Shareholders (3 inferred) 319 319 44.8% 55.2% 0
Compensation Board (12 inferred) 2,491 2,490 87.5% 12.5% 1
Compensation Shareholders (1 inferred) 87 87 41.4% 58.6% 0
Capital Structure Board (1 inferred) 2,517 2,515 94.4% 5.6% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 30 30 56.7% 43.3% 0
Audit-related Board 2,223 2,222 98.8% 1.2% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (1 inferred) 9 9 100.0% 0.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 1,334 1,274 90.2% 9.8% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (1 inferred) 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 119 119 98.3% 1.7% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 266 266 11.7% 88.3% 0
Environment or Climate Board 65 65 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 313 313 5.8% 94.2% 0
Other Board 224 212 24.1% 75.9% 12
Other Shareholders 27 27 22.2% 77.8% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 47 47 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 161 161 6.8% 93.2% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 152 151 88.7% 11.3% 1
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 44 44 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 75 75 8.0% 92.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 72 67 92.5% 7.5% 5
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (2 inferred) 21 21 95.2% 4.8% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 5 5 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (67 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where WILMINGTON FUNDS broke with the board (1,386 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
WILMINGTON FUNDS filed 32,155 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 29,940 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,904 issuer names and 5 funds. They cover 23,447 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
123 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type60 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote63 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

WILMINGTON FUNDS proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.