proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Virtus › 2024-2025

Virtus proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Virtus reported 49,854 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 38,263 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.7% of the time. On the 1,275 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 18.1% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.7% FOR of 38,263 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 35,845 AGAINST 1,663 Abstained or withheld 755

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

18.1% FOR of 1,275 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,153.

FOR 231 AGAINST 1,044 Abstained 2

See the 231 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Virtus, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (56 inferred) 26,546 25,670 97.0% 3.0% 737
Director Elections Shareholders (3 inferred) 7 7 85.7% 14.3% 0
Corporate Governance Board 3,944 3,925 92.6% 7.4% 18
Corporate Governance Shareholders (4 inferred) 565 559 49.7% 50.3% 4
Audit-related Board 3,748 3,735 99.2% 0.8% 1
Audit-related Shareholders (5 inferred) 17 13 92.3% 7.7% 4
Say-on-Pay Board (224 inferred) 3,196 3,008 89.3% 10.7% 5
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (2 inferred) 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0
Compensation Board (16 inferred) 2,506 2,497 85.4% 14.6% 6
Compensation Shareholders (3 inferred) 163 163 31.3% 68.7% 0
Capital Structure Board 2,479 2,468 93.4% 6.6% 5
Capital Structure Shareholders 51 51 80.4% 19.6% 0
Other Social Issues Board 131 131 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 745 736 18.8% 81.2% 1
Environment or Climate Board 73 73 98.6% 1.4% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 674 669 7.6% 92.4% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 53 53 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 421 418 9.3% 90.7% 1
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 181 164 95.7% 4.3% 15
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (1 inferred) 98 98 73.5% 26.5% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 53 53 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 186 184 23.9% 76.1% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 232 226 87.6% 12.4% 6
Other Board 120 110 82.7% 17.3% 10
Other Shareholders 16 16 62.5% 37.5% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 40 40 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (314 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Virtus broke with the board (1,773 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Virtus filed 49,854 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 44,585 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 2,443 issuer names and 71 funds. They cover 26,207 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
363 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type183 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote180 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Virtus proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.