proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › TRUST FOR PROFESSIONAL MANAGERS › 2023-2024

TRUST FOR PROFESSIONAL MANAGERS proxy voting record, 2023-2024

TRUST FOR PROFESSIONAL MANAGERS reported 41,067 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 31,377 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.2% of the time. On the 1,036 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 12.0% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.2% FOR of 31,377 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 29,238 AGAINST 1,340 Abstained or withheld 799

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

12.0% FOR of 1,036 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 914.

FOR 124 AGAINST 912 Abstained 0

See the 124 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

TRUST FOR PROFESSIONAL MANAGERS, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (2 inferred) 22,600 21,600 98.1% 1.9% 759
Director Elections Shareholders (3 inferred) 3 3 33.3% 66.7% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 3,488 3,047 82.6% 17.4% 1
Audit-related Board 3,478 3,450 99.5% 0.5% 20
Corporate Governance Board 1,818 1,768 85.0% 15.0% 16
Corporate Governance Shareholders (11 inferred) 355 348 39.9% 60.1% 1
Compensation Board 1,237 1,183 75.4% 24.6% 11
Compensation Shareholders (4 inferred) 144 144 13.2% 86.8% 0
Capital Structure Board 1,270 1,254 92.5% 7.5% 8
Capital Structure Shareholders (2 inferred) 2 2 50.0% 50.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 67 67 97.0% 3.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 659 651 9.2% 90.8% 0
Other Board 486 459 93.9% 6.1% 24
Other Shareholders (3 inferred) 28 16 18.8% 81.2% 12
Environment or Climate Board 10 10 40.0% 60.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders (12 inferred) 296 292 9.2% 90.8% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 123 115 83.5% 16.5% 4
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (4 inferred) 143 135 65.2% 34.8% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 234 231 20.3% 79.7% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 98 98 99.0% 1.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 2 2 0.0% 100.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 89 89 20.2% 79.8% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 21 21 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (41 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where TRUST FOR PROFESSIONAL MANAGERS broke with the board (1,779 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
TRUST FOR PROFESSIONAL MANAGERS filed 41,067 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 35,987 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,899 issuer names and 31 funds. They cover 18,820 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
800 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted1 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type354 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote445 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 18, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

TRUST FOR PROFESSIONAL MANAGERS proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.