proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › TIMOTHY PLAN › 2023-2024

TIMOTHY PLAN proxy voting record, 2023-2024

TIMOTHY PLAN reported 35,571 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 22,550 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 95.2% of the time. On the 192 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 59.4% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

95.2% FOR of 22,550 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 21,469 AGAINST 768 Abstained or withheld 313

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

59.4% FOR of 192 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 174.

FOR 114 AGAINST 78 Abstained 0

See the 114 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

TIMOTHY PLAN, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board 16,222 15,828 97.5% 2.5% 310
Other Board 6,113 6,099 92.4% 7.6% 7
Other Shareholders (18 inferred) 66 64 7.8% 92.2% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 2,794 2,502 88.8% 11.2% 0
Audit-related Board 2,630 2,630 99.0% 1.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board 519 483 97.9% 2.1% 35
Corporate Governance Shareholders (4 inferred) 444 442 55.0% 45.0% 2
Compensation Board 825 824 92.5% 7.5% 0
Compensation Shareholders (1 inferred) 37 37 70.3% 29.7% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 478 478 93.1% 6.9% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (1 inferred) 59 59 93.2% 6.8% 0
Capital Structure Board 383 383 97.1% 2.9% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 118 118 63.6% 36.4% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 73 70 100.0% 0.0% 3
Other Social Issues Shareholders 50 50 52.0% 48.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 14 14 71.4% 28.6% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 14 14 42.9% 57.1% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (24 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where TIMOTHY PLAN broke with the board (785 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
TIMOTHY PLAN filed 35,571 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 30,839 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,467 issuer names and 14 funds. They cover 18,443 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
387 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type292 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote95 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

TIMOTHY PLAN proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.