proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Tidal Trust I › 2024-2025

Tidal Trust I proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Tidal Trust I reported 49,086 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 39,726 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.8% of the time. On the 1,078 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 6.2% of the time.

2024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.8% FOR of 39,726 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 37,246 AGAINST 1,530 Abstained or withheld 950

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

6.2% FOR of 1,078 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,075.

FOR 67 AGAINST 1,011 Abstained 0

See the 67 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Tidal Trust I, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (6 inferred) 29,195 28,283 96.9% 3.1% 839
Director Elections Shareholders (7 inferred) 7 6 100.0% 0.0% 1
Audit-related Board (1 inferred) 3,953 3,928 93.2% 6.8% 24
Audit-related Shareholders (6 inferred) 8 6 100.0% 0.0% 1
Say-on-Pay Board 3,668 3,509 91.0% 9.0% 11
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (5 inferred) 5 5 100.0% 0.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board (1 inferred) 2,143 2,034 94.1% 5.9% 106
Corporate Governance Shareholders (17 inferred) 572 572 29.7% 70.3% 0
Capital Structure Board 1,608 1,573 98.9% 1.1% 35
Capital Structure Shareholders (3 inferred) 14 14 64.3% 35.7% 0
Compensation Board 1,451 1,417 95.8% 4.2% 34
Compensation Shareholders (5 inferred) 171 171 24.6% 75.4% 0
Other Board 939 861 97.9% 2.1% 78
Other Shareholders (2 inferred) 13 13 30.8% 69.2% 0
Other Social Issues Board 71 68 92.6% 7.4% 3
Other Social Issues Shareholders 621 621 6.6% 93.4% 0
Environment or Climate Board 17 17 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders (14 inferred) 452 452 8.0% 92.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 141 131 99.2% 0.8% 10
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (13 inferred) 92 92 32.6% 67.4% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 8 8 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders (4 inferred) 215 215 7.0% 93.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 205 194 98.5% 1.5% 11
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 8 8 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 155 155 5.2% 94.8% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (84 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Tidal Trust I broke with the board (2,380 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Tidal Trust I filed 49,086 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 44,740 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 2,598 issuer names and 28 funds. They cover 28,395 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
225 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type147 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote78 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Tidal Trust I proxy season coverage: 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.