proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Tidal ETF Trust › 2023-2024

Tidal ETF Trust proxy voting record, 2023-2024

Tidal ETF Trust reported 48,730 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 37,847 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 87.7% of the time. On the 1,364 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 16.6% of the time.

2023-2024

On the board’s own proposals

87.7% FOR of 37,847 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 33,187 AGAINST 781 Abstained or withheld 3,879

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

16.6% FOR of 1,364 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,174.

FOR 226 AGAINST 1,138 Abstained 0

See the 226 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Tidal ETF Trust, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (2 inferred) 27,200 23,445 99.2% 0.8% 3,726
Director Elections Shareholders (11 inferred) 38 18 61.1% 38.9% 20
Audit-related Board (1 inferred) 3,810 3,799 99.4% 0.6% 10
Audit-related Shareholders (3 inferred) 4 4 75.0% 25.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 3,801 3,372 89.9% 10.1% 13
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (6 inferred) 6 3 100.0% 0.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board 2,565 2,496 97.2% 2.8% 69
Corporate Governance Shareholders (8 inferred) 558 554 28.5% 71.5% 4
Capital Structure Board 1,835 1,745 95.2% 4.8% 87
Capital Structure Shareholders (1 inferred) 10 10 60.0% 40.0% 0
Compensation Board 1,564 1,504 89.9% 10.1% 60
Compensation Shareholders (5 inferred) 212 211 19.0% 81.0% 1
Other Social Issues Board 82 81 80.2% 19.8% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 826 826 13.2% 86.8% 0
Other Board 706 699 99.9% 0.1% 7
Other Shareholders (2 inferred) 32 32 12.5% 87.5% 0
Environment or Climate Board 19 19 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders (12 inferred) 512 512 16.2% 83.8% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 6 6 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 303 303 12.5% 87.5% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 125 119 98.3% 1.7% 6
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (2 inferred) 115 115 15.7% 84.3% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 8 8 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 211 211 19.4% 80.6% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 215 210 100.0% 0.0% 5
Investment Company Matters Board 32 32 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (53 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Tidal ETF Trust broke with the board (4,668 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Tidal ETF Trust filed 48,730 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 43,846 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 2,042 issuer names and 36 funds. They cover 23,772 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
453 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted2 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type419 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote32 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 25, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Tidal ETF Trust proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page).