proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Thrivent › 2024-2025

Thrivent proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Thrivent reported 216,259 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 168,213 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.7% of the time. On the 2,515 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 0.5% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.7% FOR of 168,213 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 157,661 AGAINST 6,537 Abstained or withheld 4,015

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

0.5% FOR of 2,515 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 2,502.

FOR 13 AGAINST 2,502 Abstained 0

See the 13 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Thrivent, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (524 inferred) 113,002 108,384 97.5% 2.5% 4,004
Director Elections Shareholders (1 inferred) 14 13 30.8% 69.2% 0
Corporate Governance Board 19,026 18,860 94.2% 5.8% 166
Corporate Governance Shareholders (7 inferred) 2,180 2,141 39.9% 60.1% 23
Say-on-Pay Board (2,845 inferred) 16,984 15,822 91.7% 8.3% 21
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (3 inferred) 3 3 66.7% 33.3% 0
Audit-related Board 16,718 16,698 99.6% 0.4% 19
Audit-related Shareholders (1 inferred) 135 131 78.6% 21.4% 4
Compensation Board (79 inferred) 12,509 12,489 85.2% 14.8% 14
Compensation Shareholders (2 inferred) 532 532 25.0% 75.0% 0
Capital Structure Board (2 inferred) 10,633 10,629 93.3% 6.7% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 138 138 66.7% 33.3% 0
Other Social Issues Board 502 502 98.4% 1.6% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,431 1,431 0.8% 99.2% 0
Environment or Climate Board 260 260 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,508 1,508 0.1% 99.9% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 225 225 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 867 867 0.1% 99.9% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 880 879 89.3% 10.7% 1
Other Board 553 553 67.5% 32.5% 0
Other Shareholders 137 135 31.1% 68.9% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 205 205 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 381 381 0.5% 99.5% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 353 329 95.7% 4.3% 24
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (1 inferred) 153 153 69.9% 30.1% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 26 26 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (3,465 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Thrivent broke with the board (2,364 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Thrivent filed 216,259 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 193,695 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 3,524 issuer names and 50 funds. They cover 38,159 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
1,783 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,141 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote642 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Thrivent proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.